On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 05:36:46PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> The regular expression I used when relicensing to GPLv2+ missed this.
> 
> Fixes: ca2749e1bd52 ("passt: Relicense to GPL 2.0, or any later version")
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>

Oh, yes, I noticed that the other day then forgot about it again.

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

> ---
>  util.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/util.h b/util.h
> index e4db33a..195023f 100644
> --- a/util.h
> +++ b/util.h
> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
>  #define VERSION_BLOB							       \
>  	VERSION "\n"							       \
>  	"Copyright Red Hat\n"						       \
> -	"GNU Affero GPL version 3 or later "				       \
> -	"<https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>\n"		       \
> +	"GNU General Public License, version 2 or later\n"		       \
> +	"  <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html>\n"	       \
>  	"This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.\n" \
>  	"There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.\n\n"
>  

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson