public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC: Updates for cppcheck-2.12 warnings
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:36:12 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRt+HNT6gfljrxkk@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230929173134.4f7c1947@elisabeth>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2148 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 05:31:34PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:50:18 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > cppcheck 2.12 (which Fedora 38 has updated, for one) introduces a
> > number of new warnings.  Unfortunately, at least one of these is a
> > clear bug in cppcheck.
> > 
> > This series fixes a number of the new warnings reported in passt
> > (patches 1..3) and works around the remaining cppcheck bug (patch 4).
> > I'm pretty confident that patches 1 & 2 are safe and beneficial to
> > apply regardless of which cppcheck we're using.
> > 
> > Patch 3 is a little more dubious, because it potentially increases the
> > cppcheck runtime.  On my system it doesn't seem to make a significant
> > difference, but that might not always stay true.
> 
> On my system, it's 23 seconds instead of 21... I don't really see a
> problem with that.

Right, it's like 16s vs 15s for me.  I was just a bit concerned they
might add more, very expensive tests under the "exhaustive" set later
on.

> > Patch 4 is a tricky one.  It applies a specific suppression to work
> > around the cppcheck bug.  That's necessary to get a pass with the
> > currently available cppcheck.  However, it's ugly and we'd like to
> > remove it once the bug is fixed, but have no obvious way to remind us
> > to do that.  What we want to do here kind of depends how long it takes
> > the bug to be fixed, which isn't clear at the moment.
> 
> I don't see a big issue with this either, we already have one
> suppression like that in tcp_clamp_window() where we kind of identified
> the issue but it hasn't been solved yet.
> 
> Once it's fixed, we'll hopefully notice and drop the suppression if
> cppcheck 2.12 is old enough by then, but if we don't, I don't think it's
> a drama.
> 
> The whole series looks good to me by the way.

Ok.  Well, apply whenever you're ready then, I guess.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-03  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-29  5:50 [PATCH 0/4] RFC: Updates for cppcheck-2.12 warnings David Gibson
2023-09-29  5:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] cppcheck: Make many pointers const David Gibson
2023-09-29  5:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] conf: Remove overly cryptic selection of forward table David Gibson
2023-09-29  5:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] cppcheck: Use "exhaustive" level checking when available David Gibson
2023-09-29  5:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] cppcheck: Work around bug in cppcheck 2.12.0 David Gibson
2023-09-29  5:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] RFC: Updates for cppcheck-2.12 warnings David Gibson
2023-09-29 15:31 ` Stefano Brivio
2023-10-03  2:36   ` David Gibson [this message]
2023-10-05  6:19     ` Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZRt+HNT6gfljrxkk@zatzit \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).