From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cppcheck,valgrind: Don't pass NULL to recv() with MSG_TRUNC
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 19:11:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVR9JxXlDNsKG8Xu@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231115063259.2c7bc5b0@elisabeth>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1908 bytes --]
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 06:32:59AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:41:24 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > Usually, of course, it's invalid to pass a NULL buffer to recv(). However,
> > it's acceptable when using MSG_TRUNC, because that suppresses actually
> > writing to the buffer. So, we pass NULL in tcp_sock_consume().
> >
> > Unfortunately, checker tools aren't always aware of that special case: we
> > already have a suppression for cppcheck to cover this. valgrind-3.22.0
> > (present in Fedora 39) has a similar problem, generating a spurious warning
> > here.
>
> I haven't tried valgrind 3.22 yet, but... do you happen to know why
> test/valgrind.supp doesn't cover this anymore?
Huh.. I hadn't spotted there was an existing suppression. I don't
know why that's not working any more, I can have a closer look.
> > We could generate another suppression for valgrind, however, it so happens
> > that we already have tcp_buf_discard ready to hand. If we pass this
> > instead of NULL it makes both cppcheck and valgrind happy. We're still
> > using the MSG_TRUNC flag, the kernel doesn't actually have to copy data,
> > so we should still have the performance benefits of it.
>
> I'm not enthusiastic about this, because using tcp_buf_discard there
> might tell an optimising compiler that it's useful to prefetch it.
>
> We would also pass the actual address of tcp_buf_discard to the kernel,
> and I'm not sure if this has further subtle implications on possible
> optimisations in the kernel implementation (even though as you said no
> data is actually copied).
Ok, fair points. I'll revisit this.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-15 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-15 4:41 [PATCH] cppcheck,valgrind: Don't pass NULL to recv() with MSG_TRUNC David Gibson
2023-11-15 5:32 ` Stefano Brivio
2023-11-15 8:11 ` David Gibson [this message]
2023-11-16 5:25 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZVR9JxXlDNsKG8Xu@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).