On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:46:08PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> According to gcc, PRIu32 matches the type of the argument we're
> printing here on both 64 and 32-bits architectures. According to
> Clang, though, that's not the case, as the result of the sum is an
> unsigned long on 64-bit.
> 
> Use the z modifier, given that we're summing uint32_t to size_t, and
> the result is at most promoted to size_t.

Heh, sorry, obviously hadn't read this patch when I commented on this
spot in the first one.  The problem here is that the final promoted
type depends on whether size_t is wider than uint32_t or not, which
can vary with architecture.

That said, I doubt we're likely to support anything with a size_t
strictly *less* than 32-bits, so %zu is probably safe.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> ---
>  packet.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/packet.c b/packet.c
> index 12ac76b..ccfc846 100644
> --- a/packet.c
> +++ b/packet.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void *packet_get_do(const struct pool *p, size_t idx, size_t offset,
>  
>  	if (p->pkt[idx].offset + len + offset > p->buf_size) {
>  		if (func) {
> -			trace("packet offset plus length %lu from size %zu, "
> +			trace("packet offset plus length %zu from size %zu, "
>  			      "%s:%i", p->pkt[idx].offset + len + offset,
>  			      p->buf_size, func, line);
>  		}

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson