On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:06:46AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: > On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 11:15:47 +1100 > David Gibson wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 02:46:07PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > > Types size_t and ssize_t are not necessarily long, it depends on the > > > architecture. > > > > Most LGTM, but a couple of nits: > > > > [snip] > > > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void *packet_get_do(const struct pool *p, size_t idx, size_t offset, > > > > > > if (p->pkt[idx].offset + len + offset > p->buf_size) { > > > if (func) { > > > - trace("packet offset plus length %lu from size %lu, " > > > + trace("packet offset plus length %lu from size %zu, " > > > > The change here is certainly correct. But the remaining %lu is > > dubious. The value given is the sum of a uint32_t and two size_t, so > > it could depend on platform what exactly that will be promoted to. I > > think we should probably either cast the result explicitly to (size_t) > > and use %zu, or cast to (uint32_t) and use "%" PRIu32. > > > > [snip] > > > diff --git a/tcp_splice.c b/tcp_splice.c > > > index a5c1332..8d08bb4 100644 > > > --- a/tcp_splice.c > > > +++ b/tcp_splice.c > > > @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int tcp_splice_connect_finish(const struct ctx *c, > > > > > > if (fcntl(conn->pipe[side][0], F_SETPIPE_SZ, > > > c->tcp.pipe_size)) { > > > - trace("TCP (spliced): cannot set %d->%d pipe size to %lu", > > > + trace("TCP (spliced): cannot set %d->%d pipe size to %zu", > > > side, !side, c->tcp.pipe_size); > > > } > > > } > > > @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ retry: > > > readlen = splice(conn->s[fromside], NULL, > > > conn->pipe[fromside][1], NULL, c->tcp.pipe_size, > > > SPLICE_F_MOVE | SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK); > > > - trace("TCP (spliced): %li from read-side call", readlen); > > > + trace("TCP (spliced): %zi from read-side call", readlen); > > > if (readlen < 0) { > > > if (errno == EINTR) > > > goto retry; > > > @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ eintr: > > > written = splice(conn->pipe[fromside][0], NULL, > > > conn->s[!fromside], NULL, to_write, > > > SPLICE_F_MOVE | more | SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK); > > > - trace("TCP (spliced): %li from write-side call (passed %lu)", > > > + trace("TCP (spliced): %zi from write-side call (passed %zu)", > > > written, to_write); > > > > 'to_write' is actually an ssize_t which would suggest %zi. However > > looking at the code, I think to_write probably *should* be a size_t > > instead. > > Oops, I didn't notice. Well, I know we're passing it to splice(), but > we're also using it like this: > > if (!never_read && written < to_write) { > to_write -= written; > goto retry; > } > > so I'd rather keep it as ssize_t for the moment (and re-spin this > series with a %zi here), just in case we happen to do something silly > with it and ssize_t is saving us. Eh.. that's the only place we subtract, and the literal line above verifies that the result will still be positive, so I think we're safe. But, whatever. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson