From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] tcp: Fix address type for tcp_sock_init_af()
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:42:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZYzgkShLZENqV_tX@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231227212506.75eb41c7@elisabeth>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3138 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 09:25:06PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 01:31:33 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > This takes a struct in_addr * (i.e. an IPv4 address), although it's
> > explicitly supposed to handle IPv6 as well. Both its caller and sock_l4()
> > which it calls use a void * for the address, which can be either an in_addr
> > or an in6_addr.
> >
> > We get away with this, because we don't do anything with the pointer other
> > than transfer it from the caller to sock_l4(), but it's misleading. And
> > quite possibly technically UB, because C is like that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> > tcp.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
> > index f506cfd..bda95b2 100644
> > --- a/tcp.c
> > +++ b/tcp.c
> > @@ -2905,7 +2905,7 @@ void tcp_sock_handler(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events)
> > * Return: fd for the new listening socket, negative error code on failure
> > */
> > static int tcp_sock_init_af(const struct ctx *c, int af, in_port_t port,
> > - const struct in_addr *addr, const char *ifname)
> > + const void *addr, const char *ifname)
>
> This is obviously correct.
>
> However, after a lot of thinking: (gcc) optimisations based on
> Type-Based Alias Analysis, which we don't disable on this path, could,
> now, happily defer filling 'addr' with inet_pton() in conf_ports() to a
> point *after* the tcp_sock_init() call.
Hrm... possibly. The fact that the addr variable in conf_ports() is a
char array, not a struct in*_addr might save us. I think replacing it
with a union of an in_addr and in6_addr would also be ok.
> Without this patch, at least 32 bits must be updated before the call.
I'm not sure that's correct. If the compiler is allowed to assume
that a char[] and a void * aren't aliased (even if they clearly are),
then I'd expect it to also be allowed to assume that a char[] and a
struct in_addr * aren't aliased.
> It might sound like a joke because... it actually is. But look at what
> we had to do for the functions in checksum.c. We pass const void *buf,
> and anything that buf points to can be updated (with TBAA) after the
> call.
>
> I don't see any conceptual difference between this case and those
> functions.
>
> Anyway, that won't reasonably happen here, and in any case this would
> have been broken for IPv6, so I'll go ahead and apply this.
>
> But, eventually, I think we should switch all these usages to union
> inany_addr *.
So, we may be able to use union inany_addr in some places, but that's
not the same thing as this: inany_addr carries IPv4 addresses as
mapped IPv6 addresses, it's not switched on a separate af parameter.
We could, of course, define a new type as a simple union of in_addr
and in6_addr.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-28 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 14:31 [PATCH 0/8] Small cleanups related to addresses and binding David Gibson
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] tcp: Fix address type for tcp_sock_init_af() David Gibson
2023-12-27 20:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2023-12-28 2:42 ` David Gibson [this message]
2023-12-28 10:11 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-01-07 5:35 ` David Gibson
2024-01-13 22:50 ` Stefano Brivio
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] treewide: Use IN4ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT more widely David Gibson
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] treewide: Add IN4ADDR_ANY_INIT macro David Gibson
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] util: Use htonl_constant() in more places David Gibson
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] util: Improve sockaddr initialisation in sock_l4() David Gibson
2023-12-27 20:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-01-07 5:34 ` David Gibson
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] icmp: Avoid unnecessary handling of unspecified bind address David Gibson
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 7/8] treewide: Avoid in_addr_t David Gibson
2023-12-07 14:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] util: Make sock_l4() treat empty string ifname like NULL David Gibson
2023-12-27 20:25 ` [PATCH 0/8] Small cleanups related to addresses and binding Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZYzgkShLZENqV_tX@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).