On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:45:05AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 11:05:02 +1100 > David Gibson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 05:23:26PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > > Not a full review, but a couple of comments, mostly about stuff I also > > > had in pkt_selfie.c (review of v1): > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 14:05:38 +1100 > > > David Gibson wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 01:07:55PM -0500, Jon Maloy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > + s[0] = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP); > > > > > + s[1] = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM | SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_TCP); > > > > > + if (s[0] < 0 || s[1] < 0) { > > > > > + perror("Temporary probe socket creation failed\n"); > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > + } > > > > > + if (0 > bind(s[0], &a, sizeof(a))) { > > > > > > > > Since the socket address is unspecified, why do you need to bind at > > > > all? It might be clearer to explicitly set a to localhost + a > > > > specific port - because you're in a temporary namespace, you can rely > > > > on every port being available. > > > > > > There are two advantages of bind() without port, and then getsockname(): > > > first, ip_unprivileged_port_start might have whatever value in our new > > > namespace (we don't touch it), and I wouldn't take for granted we'll > > > have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in it for all the possible start-up combinations. > > > > > > Second, there's no need for a magic value. > > > > Good point. Note that at present we're not bind()ing to an address > > either. > > > > > > > + perror("Temporary probe socket bind() failed\n"); > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > + } > > > > > + if (0 > getsockname(s[0], &a, &((socklen_t) { sizeof(a) }))) { > > > > > + perror("Temporary probe socket getsockname() failed\n"); > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > + } > > > > > + if (0 > listen(s[0], 0)) { > > > > > + perror("Temporary probe socket listen() failed\n"); > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > + } > > > > > + if (0 <= connect(s[1], &a, sizeof(a)) || errno != EINPROGRESS) { > > > > > + perror("Temporary probe socket connect() failed\n"); > > > > > + goto out; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > This is assuming that a will now contain the correct address to > > > > connect to. Although it will have the right port, I think the address > > > > may still be unspecified for the listening socket. > > > > > > Hmm, why? From getsockname(2): > > > > > > getsockname() returns the current address to which the socket > > > sockfd is bound [...] > > > > But we've only bound ourselves to 0.0.0.0, which while perfectly > > cromulent for a listening socket, is no good for connect(). > > Hah, "cromulent" just embiggened my dictionary! Why not, though? From > RFC 6890, 2.2.2: > > +----------------------+----------------------------+ > | Attribute | Value | > +----------------------+----------------------------+ > | Address Block | 0.0.0.0/8 | > | Name | "This host on this network"| Huh. I never realised you could use 0.0.0.0 like that. I guess that makes it work, though I still feel like explicitly using localhost would be clearer. > and: > > $ strace -e connect ./pkt_selfie > --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_EXITED, si_pid=891325, si_uid=1000, si_status=0, si_utime=0, si_stime=0} --- > connect(5, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(51155), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in progress) > MSG_PEEK with offset not supported > +++ exited with 0 +++ > > with pkt_selfie.c from review of v1: > > https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/20231206160808.3d312733@elisabeth/ > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson