On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:09:10PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:56:49 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Currently if tcp_sock_refill_pool() is unable to fill all the slots in the
> > pool, it will silently exit.  This might lead to a later attempt to get
> > fds from the pool to fail at which point it will be harder to tell what
> > originally went wrong.
> > 
> > Instead add warnings if we're unable to refill any of the socket pools when
> > requested.  We have tcp_sock_refill_pool() return an error and report it
> > in the callers, because those callers have more context allowing for a
> > more useful message.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> >  tcp.c        | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >  tcp_conn.h   |  2 +-
> >  tcp_splice.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> >  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
> > index d49210bc..ad56ffc3 100644
> > --- a/tcp.c
> > +++ b/tcp.c
> > @@ -3007,8 +3007,10 @@ static int tcp_ns_socks_init(void *arg)
> >   * @c:		Execution context
> >   * @pool:	Pool of sockets to refill
> >   * @af:		Address family to use
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, -ve error code if there was at least one error
> 
> Is -ve an abbreviation for something or just a typo? It sounds like the
> voltage of the emitter in a BJT transistor.

Oh, it's supposed to be an abbreviation for "negative".

> Must be a typo, the rest of the patch looks good to me, I can also fix
> this up while applying.

Go ahead, please.


-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson