From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH] util: fix confusion between offset in the iovec array and in the entry
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:27:37 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfplubJ0s6KAdV6W@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240319101340.1724586-1-lvivier@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2115 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:13:40AM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> In write_remainder() 'skip' is the offset to start the operation from
> in the iovec array.
>
> In iov_skip_bytes(), 'skip' is also the offset in the iovec array but
> 'offset' is the first unskipped byte in the iovec entry.
>
> As write_remainder() uses 'skip' for both, 'skip' is reset to the
> first unskipped byte in the iovec entry rather to staying the first
> unskipped byte in the iovec array.
>
> Fix the problem by introducing a new variable not to overwrite 'skip'
> on each loop.
>
> Fixes: 8bdb0883b441 ("util: Add write_remainder() helper")
> Cc: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Ouch. *dons paper bag*
I believe this is correct as it stands, but..
> ---
> util.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
> index 3b2393d6bfa8..eee53aed811b 100644
> --- a/util.c
> +++ b/util.c
> @@ -533,13 +533,14 @@ int do_clone(int (*fn)(void *), char *stack_area, size_t stack_size, int flags,
> int write_remainder(int fd, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt, size_t skip)
> {
> int i;
> + size_t offset;
>
> - while ((i = iov_skip_bytes(iov, iovcnt, skip, &skip)) < iovcnt) {
> + while ((i = iov_skip_bytes(iov, iovcnt, skip, &offset)) < iovcnt) {
> ssize_t rc;
>
> if (skip) {
.. it would be more optimal if you checked for offset != 0 rather than
skip != 0 here. Otherwise even once we've written an entire buffer,
we'll continue to write the rest of the buffers one by one, rather
than writing them all with a writev().
> - rc = write(fd, (char *)iov[i].iov_base + skip,
> - iov[i].iov_len - skip);
> + rc = write(fd, (char *)iov[i].iov_base + offset,
> + iov[i].iov_len - offset);
> } else {
> rc = writev(fd, &iov[i], iovcnt - i);
> }
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-19 10:13 [PATCH] util: fix confusion between offset in the iovec array and in the entry Laurent Vivier
2024-03-20 4:27 ` David Gibson [this message]
2024-03-20 7:02 ` Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfplubJ0s6KAdV6W@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).