On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:18:00AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> If the template host interface is of type tun, and it's configured
> with a point-to-point peer address (that's what happens for example
> with openvpn and '--topology net30'), pasta will copy the peer
> information onto the namespace interface.
> 
> But the namespace interface is not actually a point-to-point tunnel,
> and we won't resolve the peer address via ARP either, so we have
> to drop this information to get the expected behaviour (traffic
> regularly sent over our tap interface).
> 
> Link: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/22320
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> ---
>  netlink.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/netlink.c b/netlink.c
> index 89c0641..73aaa4b 100644
> --- a/netlink.c
> +++ b/netlink.c
> @@ -792,8 +792,8 @@ int nl_addr_dup(int s_src, unsigned int ifi_src,
>  
>  	seq = nl_send(s_src, &req, RTM_GETADDR, NLM_F_DUMP, sizeof(req));
>  	nl_foreach_oftype(nh, status, s_src, buf, seq, RTM_NEWADDR) {
> +		struct rtattr *rta, *rta_local = NULL;
>  		struct ifaddrmsg *ifa;
> -		struct rtattr *rta;
>  		size_t na;
>  
>  		ifa = (struct ifaddrmsg *)NLMSG_DATA(nh);
> @@ -804,12 +804,33 @@ int nl_addr_dup(int s_src, unsigned int ifi_src,
>  
>  		ifa->ifa_index = ifi_dst;
>  
> +		for (rta = IFA_RTA(ifa), na = IFA_PAYLOAD(nh); RTA_OK(rta, na);
> +		     rta = RTA_NEXT(rta, na)) {
> +			if (rta->rta_type == IFA_LOCAL) {
> +				rta_local = rta;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
>  		for (rta = IFA_RTA(ifa), na = IFA_PAYLOAD(nh); RTA_OK(rta, na);
>  		     rta = RTA_NEXT(rta, na)) {
>  			/* Strip label and expiry (cacheinfo) information */
>  			if (rta->rta_type == IFA_LABEL ||
>  			    rta->rta_type == IFA_CACHEINFO)
>  				rta->rta_type = IFA_UNSPEC;
> +
> +			/* Different values for IFA_ADDRESS and IFA_LOCAL mean
> +			 * that IFA_LOCAL is the locally configured address, and
> +			 * IFA_ADDRESS is the peer address for a point-to-point
> +			 * interface. But our namespace interface isn't really a
> +			 * point-to-point tunnel, and we can't resolve that peer
> +			 * address via ARP: simply drop it, and keep the local
> +			 * address.

Could we just unconditionally remove IFA_ADDRESS properties (by
setting them to IFA_UNSPEC)?  That we we could avoid having two passes
through the attributes.

> +			 */
> +			if (rta->rta_type == IFA_ADDRESS && rta_local) {
> +				memcpy(RTA_DATA(rta), RTA_DATA(rta_local),
> +				       RTA_PAYLOAD(rta));
> +			}
>  		}
>  
>  		rc = nl_do(s_dst, nh, RTM_NEWADDR,

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson