From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] tap: refactor packets handling functions
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:37:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmlCHgxV1O3sgEqb@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612083408.43fffc4f@elisabeth>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3988 bytes --]
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 08:34:21AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:18:59 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 12:09:50AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:21:24 +0200
> > > Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Consolidate pool_tap4() and pool_tap6() into pool_flush_all(),
> > > > and tap4_handler() and tap6_handler() into tap_handler_all().
> > > > Create a generic packet_add_all() to consolidate packet
> > > > addition logic and reduce code duplication.
> > > >
> > > > The purpose is to ease the export of these functions to use
> > > > them with the vhost-user backend.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tap.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > > > tap.h | 7 ++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> > > > index 2ea08491a51f..5fb3cb83f3d2 100644
> > > > --- a/tap.c
> > > > +++ b/tap.c
> > > > @@ -920,6 +920,61 @@ append:
> > > > return in->count;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * pool_flush() - Flush both IPv4 and IPv6 packet pools
> > > > + */
> > > > +void pool_flush_all(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + pool_flush(pool_tap4);
> > > > + pool_flush(pool_tap6);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * tap_handler_all() - IPv4/IPv4 and ARP packet handler for tap file descriptor
> > >
> > > IPv4/IPv6
> > >
> > > > + * @c: Execution context
> > > > + * @now: Current timestamp
> > > > + */
> > > > +void tap_handler_all(struct ctx *c, const struct timespec *now)
> > >
> > > I wonder if this shouldn't be named tap_handler() instead. As we
> > > already have tap_handler_passt() and tap_handler_pasta(), it's not
> > > immediately clear what "all" refers to.
> >
> > I concur, I think tap_handler() is a better name.
> >
> > > > +{
> > > > + tap4_handler(c, pool_tap4, now);
> > > > + tap6_handler(c, pool_tap6, now);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * packet_add_all_do() - Add a packet to the appropriate TAP pool
> > >
> > > A couple of remarks here:
> > >
> > > - it's a bit unexpected that this is still in tap.c (it adds packets to
> > > a pool, it should be in packet.c judging by this name/description).
> > > If we call it tap_queue_packet(), then it probably makes more sense?
> > >
> > > - this does more than adding a packet to a pool. It's probably useless
> > > to describe in detail what this does, as the function body is anyway
> > > rather short and clear, but the current description could be a bit
> > > misleading. What about "Queue/capture packet, update notion of
> > > guest MAC address"?
> >
> > So, given this, I think it does make more sense for this to be in
> > tap.c than packet.c. How about calling it tap_add_packets().
>
> It's a single packet it adds, so perhaps tap_add_packet()?
Good point.
> > > - what happens if you just call packet_add() from here, without dealing
> > > with 'func' and 'line'? I think it's fine to print in tracing output
> > > name and lines from this function, instead of the ones from the
> > > caller. It's obvious who the caller is
> >
> > It is as of this patch, but I believe the idea is this will also be
> > called from VU code down the line.
>
> Okay, but even then, it would be obvious from previous tracing output
> who the caller is. What's relevant here is to log that something went
> wrong while adding a packet to an IPv4 or IPv6 pool. I don't think we
> should bother passing around function name and line to log anything
> else.
Yeah, fair enough.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 15:21 [PATCH v5 0/8] Add vhost-user support to passt (part 2) Laurent Vivier
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] tcp: extract buffer management from tcp_send_flag() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 5:31 ` David Gibson
2024-06-11 11:42 ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 6:31 ` David Gibson
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:32 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] tcp: move buffers management functions to their own file Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:14 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 12:03 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] tap: refactor packets handling functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:18 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 6:34 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:37 ` David Gibson [this message]
2024-06-12 6:21 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] udp: refactor UDP header update functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:27 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] udp: rename udp_sock_handler() to udp_buf_sock_handler() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 6:28 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] vhost-user: compare mode MODE_PASTA and not MODE_PASST Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iov: remove iov_copy() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] tap: use in->buf_size rather than sizeof(pkt_buf) Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmlCHgxV1O3sgEqb@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).