public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top, Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] conf: Accept duplicate and conflicting options, the last one wins
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:03:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnNxwGGpT-whmrgQ@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240619094522.4515597e@elisabeth>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13090 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 09:45:30AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:50:44 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 06:17:23PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > > In multiple occasions, especially when passt(1) and pasta(1) are used
> > > in integrations such as the one with Podman, the ability to override
> > > earlier options on the command line with later one would have been
> > > convenient.
> > > 
> > > Recently, to debug a number of issues happening with Podman, I would
> > > have liked to ask users to share a debug log by passing --debug as
> > > additional option, but pasta refuses --quiet (always passed by Podman)
> > > and --debug at the same time.
> > > 
> > > Finally, somebody took care of this on Podman side at:
> > >   https://github.com/containers/common/pull/2052
> > > 
> > > but still, we'll probably have similar cases, or older versions of
> > > Podman around, etc.
> > > 
> > > I think there's some value in telling users about duplicated or
> > > conflicting options, because that might reveal issues in integrations
> > > or accidental misconfigurations, but by now I'm fairly convinced that
> > > the downsides outweigh this.  
> > 
> > I tend to agree.
> > 
> > > Drop checks about duplicate options and mutually exclusive ones. In
> > > some cases, we need to also undo a couple of initialisations caused
> > > by earlier options, but this looks like a simplification, overall.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
> > > Suggested-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>  
> > 
> > [snip]
> > > +		case 'd':
> > >  			c->debug = 1;
> > > +			c->quiet = 0;
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'e':
> > > -			if (logfile)
> > > -				die("Can't log to both file and stderr");
> > > -
> > > -			if (c->force_stderr)
> > > -				die("Multiple --stderr options given");
> > > -
> > >  			c->force_stderr = 1;
> > > +			logfile = NULL;
> > >  			break;  
> > 
> > I would suggest leaving this one as is for now.  I think the least
> > surprising behaviour for -e and -l together would be to log to both
> > stderr and the file.  They're not inherently contradictory, it's just
> > because of an implementation limitation.
> 
> It's not really because of something missing in the implementation,
> it's that way because the KubeVirt integration needed to ensure that,
> with a log file, we won't print anything to standard error (which was
> otherwise giving them issues).

Hmmmmm...  I mean, I get that we generally want to make things easy
for KubeVirt.  But I don't think we want to implement otherwise more
surprising behaviour, just so they can avoid a '2> /dev/null'.

> > Theferore, in this case, I
> > think it's best to give an error rather than behaving in a surprising
> > way.  Later on we can implement being able to log to both at once.
> 
> But sure, one might have the reasonable expectation (even though that
> would conflict with the description from the man page) that -e and -l
> would log to file and stderr at the same time, so I'll drop this part,
> and describe this behaviour as an exception in the man page.
> 
> > >  		case 'l':
> > > -			if (c->force_stderr)
> > > -				die("Can't log to both stderr and file");
> > > -
> > > -			if (logfile)
> > > -				die("Multiple --log-file options given");
> > > -
> > >  			logfile = optarg;
> > > +			c->force_stderr = 0;  
> > 
> > Same here, of course.
> > 
> > 
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'q':
> > > -			if (c->quiet)
> > > -				die("Multiple --quiet options given");
> > > -
> > > -			if (c->debug)
> > > -				die("Either --debug or --quiet");
> > > -
> > >  			c->quiet = 1;
> > > +			c->debug = c->trace = 0;
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'f':
> > > -			if (c->foreground)
> > > -				die("Multiple --foreground options given");
> > > -
> > >  			c->foreground = 1;
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 's':
> > > -			if (*c->sock_path)
> > > -				die("Multiple --socket options given");
> > > -
> > >  			ret = snprintf(c->sock_path, UNIX_SOCK_MAX - 1, "%s",
> > >  				       optarg);
> > >  			if (ret <= 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(c->sock_path))
> > >  				die("Invalid socket path: %s", optarg);
> > >  
> > > +			c->fd_tap = -1;
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'F':
> > > -			if (c->fd_tap >= 0)
> > > -				die("Multiple --fd options given");
> > > -
> > >  			errno = 0;
> > >  			c->fd_tap = strtol(optarg, NULL, 0);  
> > 
> > I'm a little bit dubious about this one too.  In terms of pure
> > semantics, then yes, overriding makes sense.  But -F specifically
> > requires the caller to have set up fds in specific slots, so it's
> > pretty hard to see a real situation where overriding this would make
> > sense.
> 
> Sure, I don't see that either, but for the sake of keeping the
> documentation simple, I would still force this.

Faor enough.

> > > @@ -1460,12 +1421,9 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  				die("Invalid --fd: %s", optarg);
> > >  
> > >  			c->one_off = true;
> > > -
> > > +			*c->sock_path = 0;  
> > 
> > This makes sense, although we weren't actually giving an error for
> > that case previously.
> 
> We did, but later:
> 
> 	if (*c->sock_path && c->fd_tap >= 0)
> 		die("Options --socket and --fd are mutually exclusive");
> 
> as I'm dropping this now, we need to make sure that c->sock_path is
> cleared.

Good point.

> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'I':
> > > -			if (*c->pasta_ifn)
> > > -				die("Multiple --ns-ifname options given");
> > > -
> > >  			ret = snprintf(c->pasta_ifn, IFNAMSIZ, "%s",
> > >  				       optarg);
> > >  			if (ret <= 0 || ret >= IFNAMSIZ)
> > > @@ -1473,18 +1431,12 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'p':
> > > -			if (*c->pcap)
> > > -				die("Multiple --pcap options given");
> > > -  
> > 
> > Again, I'm unsure about this one, since I think the least surprising
> > behaviour would be to write to _all_ the listed pcap files.
> 
> ...but we clearly don't want to implement that. And if we give an error
> here, we should also specifically document that multiple --pcap options
> are not allowed, at this point, which just looks like unnecessary bloat
> in the man page to me.

I suppose.

> > >  			ret = snprintf(c->pcap, sizeof(c->pcap), "%s", optarg);
> > >  			if (ret <= 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(c->pcap))
> > >  				die("Invalid pcap path: %s", optarg);
> > >  
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'P':
> > > -			if (*c->pidfile)
> > > -				die("Multiple --pid options given");
> > > -
> > >  			ret = snprintf(c->pidfile, sizeof(c->pidfile), "%s",
> > >  				       optarg);
> > >  			if (ret <= 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(c->pidfile))
> > > @@ -1492,9 +1444,6 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'm':
> > > -			if (c->mtu)
> > > -				die("Multiple --mtu options given");
> > > -
> > >  			errno = 0;
> > >  			c->mtu = strtol(optarg, NULL, 0);
> > >  
> > > @@ -1544,14 +1493,12 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  			if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA)
> > >  				c->no_copy_routes = 1;
> > >  
> > > -			if (IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip6.gw)		&&
> > > -			    inet_pton(AF_INET6, optarg, &c->ip6.gw)	&&
> > > +			if (inet_pton(AF_INET6, optarg, &c->ip6.gw)     &&
> > >  			    !IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip6.gw)	&&
> > >  			    !IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&c->ip6.gw))
> > >  				break;
> > >  
> > > -			if (IN4_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip4.gw)		&&
> > > -			    inet_pton(AF_INET, optarg, &c->ip4.gw)	&&
> > > +			if (inet_pton(AF_INET, optarg, &c->ip4.gw)	&&
> > >  			    !IN4_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip4.gw)	&&
> > >  			    !IN4_IS_ADDR_BROADCAST(&c->ip4.gw)		&&
> > >  			    !IN4_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&c->ip4.gw))
> > > @@ -1560,15 +1507,11 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  			die("Invalid gateway address: %s", optarg);
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'i':
> > > -			if (ifi4 || ifi6)
> > > -				die("Redundant interface: %s", optarg);
> > > -
> > >  			if (!(ifi4 = ifi6 = if_nametoindex(optarg)))
> > >  				die_perror("Invalid interface name %s", optarg);
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'o':
> > > -			if (IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip6.addr_out)	  &&
> > > -			    inet_pton(AF_INET6, optarg, &c->ip6.addr_out) &&
> > > +			if (inet_pton(AF_INET6, optarg, &c->ip6.addr_out) &&
> > >  			    !IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip6.addr_out)	  &&
> > >  			    !IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&c->ip6.addr_out)	  &&
> > >  			    !IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(&c->ip6.addr_out)	  &&
> > > @@ -1576,8 +1519,7 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  			    !IN6_IS_ADDR_MULTICAST(&c->ip6.addr_out))
> > >  				break;
> > >  
> > > -			if (IN4_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip4.addr_out)	 &&
> > > -			    inet_pton(AF_INET, optarg, &c->ip4.addr_out) &&
> > > +			if (inet_pton(AF_INET, optarg, &c->ip4.addr_out) &&
> > >  			    !IN4_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip4.addr_out)	 &&
> > >  			    !IN4_IS_ADDR_BROADCAST(&c->ip4.addr_out)	 &&
> > >  			    !IN4_IS_ADDR_MULTICAST(&c->ip4.addr_out))
> > > @@ -1588,18 +1530,23 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'D':
> > >  			if (!strcmp(optarg, "none")) {
> > > -				if (c->no_dns)
> > > -					die("Redundant DNS options");
> > > +				c->no_dns = 1;
> > >  
> > > -				if (dns4 - c->ip4.dns || dns6 - c->ip6.dns)
> > > -					die("Conflicting DNS options");
> > > +				dns4 = &c->ip4.dns[0];
> > > +				memset(c->ip4.dns, 0, sizeof(c->ip4.dns));
> > > +				c->ip4.dns[0]    = (struct in_addr){ 0 };
> > > +				c->ip4.dns_match = (struct in_addr){ 0 };
> > > +				c->ip4.dns_host  = (struct in_addr){ 0 };
> > > +
> > > +				dns6 = &c->ip6.dns[0];
> > > +				memset(c->ip6.dns, 0, sizeof(c->ip6.dns));
> > > +				c->ip6.dns_match = (struct in6_addr){ 0 };
> > > +				c->ip6.dns_host  = (struct in6_addr){ 0 };
> > >  
> > > -				c->no_dns = 1;
> > >  				break;
> > >  			}
> > >  
> > > -			if (c->no_dns)
> > > -				die("Conflicting DNS options");
> > > +			c->no_dns = 0;
> > >  
> > >  			if (dns4 - &c->ip4.dns[0] < ARRAY_SIZE(c->ip4.dns) &&
> > >  			    inet_pton(AF_INET, optarg, &dns4_tmp)) {
> > > @@ -1617,18 +1564,14 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 'S':
> > >  			if (!strcmp(optarg, "none")) {
> > > -				if (c->no_dns_search)
> > > -					die("Redundant DNS search options");
> > > +				c->no_dns_search = 1;
> > >  
> > > -				if (dnss != c->dns_search)
> > > -					die("Conflicting DNS search options");
> > > +				memset(c->dns_search, 0, sizeof(c->dns_search));
> > >  
> > > -				c->no_dns_search = 1;
> > >  				break;
> > >  			}
> > >  
> > > -			if (c->no_dns_search)
> > > -				die("Conflicting DNS search options");
> > > +			c->no_dns_search = 0;
> > >  
> > >  			if (dnss - c->dns_search < ARRAY_SIZE(c->dns_search)) {
> > >  				ret = snprintf(dnss->n, sizeof(*c->dns_search),
> > > @@ -1644,17 +1587,16 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case '4':
> > >  			v4_only = true;
> > > +			v6_only = false;
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case '6':
> > >  			v6_only = true;
> > > +			v4_only = false;
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case '1':
> > >  			if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA)
> > >  				die("--one-off is for passt mode only");
> > >  
> > > -			if (c->one_off)
> > > -				die("Redundant --one-off option");
> > > -
> > >  			c->one_off = true;
> > >  			break;
> > >  		case 't':
> > > @@ -1673,12 +1615,6 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> > >  		}
> > >  	} while (name != -1);
> > >  
> > > -	if (v4_only && v6_only)
> > > -		die("Options ipv4-only and ipv6-only are mutually exclusive");  
> > 
> > This could now be an ASSERT() instead of an error message.
> 
> But it can't happen, right? I mean, it's very clear that when we set
> one, we clear the other one (hunk above).
> 
> > > -	if (*c->sock_path && c->fd_tap >= 0)
> > > -		die("Options --socket and --fd are mutually exclusive");
> > > -
> > >  	if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA && !c->pasta_conf_ns) {
> > >  		if (copy_routes_opt)
> > >  			die("--no-copy-routes needs --config-net");
> > > diff --git a/passt.1 b/passt.1
> > > index 31e528e..6dfa670 100644
> > > --- a/passt.1
> > > +++ b/passt.1
> > > @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ for performance reasons.
> > >  
> > >  .SH OPTIONS
> > >  
> > > +\fBIf conflicting or multiple options are given, the last one takes effect.\fR
> > > +
> > >  .TP
> > >  .BR \-d ", " \-\-debug
> > >  Be verbose, don't log to the system logger.  
> > 
> 

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-18 16:17 [PATCH] conf: Accept duplicate and conflicting options, the last one wins Stefano Brivio
2024-06-19  1:50 ` David Gibson
2024-06-19  7:45   ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-20  0:03     ` David Gibson [this message]
2024-06-19  9:06 ` Paul Holzinger
2024-06-19 10:22   ` Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZnNxwGGpT-whmrgQ@zatzit \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=pholzing@redhat.com \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).