On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 12:42:57PM +0100, David Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jul 2024, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> I may be missing something subtle, but is j intended to be used twice here,
> rather than k?

Indeed not, good catch, thanks.

> > +
> > +static void check_all_orders(void)
> > +{
> > +	int norders = sizeof(orders) / sizeof(orders[0]);
> > +	int i, j, k, l;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < norders; i++)
> > +		for (j = 0; j < norders; j++)
> > +			for (k = 0; k < norders; k++)
> > +				for (l = 0; l < norders; l++)
> > +					check_one_order(orders[i], orders[j],
> > +							orders[j], orders[l]);
> --------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^
> > +}
> 

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson