From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] tcp: Pass TCP header and payload separately to tcp_update_check_tcp[46]()
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:26:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyCqQY99BTXGaxOq@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029100954.7eb6b8a9@elisabeth>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4021 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:07:56 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 02:02:25PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 07:42:54PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:40:44 +1100
> > > > David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Currently these expects both the TCP header and payload in a single IOV,
> > > > > and goes to some trouble to locate the checksum field within it. In the
> > > > > current caller we've already know where the TCP header is, so we might as
> > > > > well just pass it in. This will need to work a bit differently for
> > > > > vhost-user, but that code already needs to locate the TCP header for other
> > > > > reasons, so again we can just pass it in.
> > > >
> > > > We couldn't do this, and also what you're now doing in 5/7, because
> > > > with vhost-user the TCP header is not aligned, so we can't pass it
> > > > around as a pointer, see:
> > > >
> > > > <ZeUpxEY-sn64NLE5@zatzit>
> > > > https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/ZeUpxEY-sn64NLE5@zatzit/
> > > >
> > > > and following. That one is about IP headers, but the same applies to
> > > > TCP and UDP headers.
> > >
> > > Hrm. I'm aware it theoretically need not be aligned, but I thought it
> > > was in practice.. and that we were already relying on that.
> > >
> > > In fact, I'm pretty sure the second part is true, although more subtly
> > > than here. v8 of the vhost-user patches calls tcp_fill_headers[46]()
> > > with the bp parameter set to the offset of the TCP header. If
> > > creating a tcphdr * there is a problem, then creating a tcp_payload_t
> > > * can't be any better.
>
> Ah, okay, I missed that. Still, I think we should ask gcc for an
> opinion (with the vhost-user series on top of this series), because
> those build-time pointer alignment checks are pretty reliable.
I'm not exactly sure what you're suggesting with this. I don't think
the compiler will catch it in this case, because we're constructing
the (possibly) misaligned pointer as a (void *), then implicitly
casting it by passing it to a (tcp_payload_t *) argument. (void *) is
explicitly allowed to be cast to any pointer type, so I think the
compiler will take this as asserting we know what we're doing. More
fool it.
> > > > Of course the current solution is not elegant and it would be nice to
> > > > find another way to deal with it, but we couldn't come up with anything
> > > > better back then.
> > > >
> > > > The rest of the series looks good to me, but I'm afraid that without
> > > > this one and 5/7 the other changes will be a bit more complicated to
> > > > implement (if at all possible).
> > >
> > > Definitely. I have so ideas for approaches more robust to
> > > misalignment, but they're substantially more complicated. I was
> > > hoping we could avoid it at least for now.
> >
> > I had a closer look at that earlier message now. I believe at the
> > time I was aiming for fully robust handling of misaligned user
> > buffers. AIUI, we've given up on that for the time being: instead
> > we'll just *test* for suitable alignment and we can do the hard work
> > of handling it if it ever arises in practice.
>
> Right, and we can use the compiler to test for suitable alignment.
I do see allowing the compiler to check this in more cases as an
advantage of using explicitly typed pointers where we can.
Btw, I didn't find a use for it just yet, but I also have a draft
patch which adds a function+macro that extracts a typed pointer from a
given offset into a IO vector, verifying that it's contiguous and
properly aligned.
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-28 9:40 [PATCH 0/7] Rework some IOV handling in TCP code David Gibson
2024-10-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/7] tcp: Pass TCP header and payload separately to tcp_update_check_tcp[46]() David Gibson
2024-10-28 18:42 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-10-29 3:02 ` David Gibson
2024-10-29 4:07 ` David Gibson
2024-10-29 9:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-10-29 9:26 ` David Gibson [this message]
2024-10-29 10:32 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-10-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 2/7] tcp: Move tcp_l2_buf_fill_headers() to tcp_buf.c David Gibson
2024-10-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 3/7] tcp: Rework tcp_l2_buf_fill_headers() into tcp_buf_make_frame() David Gibson
2024-10-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 4/7] tcp: Don't use return value from tcp_fill_headers[46] to adjust iov_len David Gibson
2024-10-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 5/7] tcp: Pass TCP header and payload separately to tcp_fill_headers[46]() David Gibson
2024-10-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 6/7] tcp: Merge tcp_update_check_tcp[46]() David Gibson
2024-10-28 9:40 ` [PATCH 7/7] tcp: Fold tcp_update_csum() into tcp_fill_header() David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyCqQY99BTXGaxOq@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).