public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] test: Re-implement pasta NDP tests using tunbridge & exeter
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:32:27 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOXNOyWfgkH3sY03@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251007220110.3c8bf21c@elisabeth>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12364 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 10:01:10PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Thu,  2 Oct 2025 17:57:08 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Convert the pasta NDP tests from shell and our own DSL to Python using
> > the exeter test protocol and tunbridge network simulation library.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> >  test/Makefile          |  2 +-
> >  test/pasta/dhcp        |  5 ++++
> >  test/pasta/ndp.py      | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  test/run               |  6 +++--
> >  test/tasst/__init__.py |  4 +++
> >  test/tasst/pasta.py    | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  6 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100755 test/pasta/ndp.py
> >  create mode 100644 test/tasst/pasta.py
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/Makefile b/test/Makefile
> > index f66c7e7e..95e3d75e 100644
> > --- a/test/Makefile
> > +++ b/test/Makefile
> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ ASSETS = $(DOWNLOAD_ASSETS) $(LOCAL_ASSETS)
> >  
> >  EXETER_SH = smoke/smoke.sh build/static_checkers.sh
> >  EXETER_PYPATH = exeter/py3:tunbridge/:.
> > -EXETER_PYTHON = smoke/smoke.py build/build.py
> > +EXETER_PYTHON = smoke/smoke.py build/build.py pasta/ndp.py
> >  EXETER_BATS = $(EXETER_SH:%=%.bats) $(EXETER_PYTHON:%=%.bats)
> >  BATS_FILES = $(EXETER_BATS) \
> >  	podman/test/system/505-networking-pasta.bats
> > diff --git a/test/pasta/dhcp b/test/pasta/dhcp
> > index e1c66be6..61279fbf 100644
> > --- a/test/pasta/dhcp
> > +++ b/test/pasta/dhcp
> > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ test	Interface name
> >  nsout	IFNAME ip -j link show | jq -rM '.[] | select(.link_type == "ether").ifname'
> >  check	[ -n "__IFNAME__" ]
> >  
> > +# Bring up the interface
> > +ns	ip link set dev __IFNAME__ up
> > +# Wait for SLAAC & DAD to complete
> > +ns	while ! ip -j -6 addr show dev __IFNAME__ | jq -e '.[].addr_info.[] | select(.protocol == "kernel_ra")'; do sleep 0.1; done
> > +
> >  test	DHCP: address
> >  ns	/sbin/dhclient -4 --no-pid __IFNAME__
> >  nsout	ADDR ip -j -4 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[0].local'
> > diff --git a/test/pasta/ndp.py b/test/pasta/ndp.py
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..8c7ce31e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/pasta/ndp.py
> > @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> > +#! /usr/bin/env python3
> > +#
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +#
> > +# test/pasta/ndp.py - pasta NDP functionality
> > +#
> > +# Copyright Red Hat
> > +# Author: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > +
> > +import contextlib
> > +import dataclasses
> > +from typing import Iterator
> > +
> > +import exeter
> > +import tunbridge
> > +import tasst
> > +
> > +
> > +@dataclasses.dataclass
> > +class UnconfiguredScenario(exeter.Scenario):
> > +    """Tests for a pasta instance without --config-net"""
> > +
> > +    host: tunbridge.Site
> > +    guest: tunbridge.Site
> > +    ifname: str
> > +    addr6: tunbridge.ip.AddrMask6
> > +    gw6: tunbridge.ip.Addr6
> 
> Until this point, it looks like stuff I can happily copy and paste,
> and grasp, even. But then:
> 
> > +    @exeter.scenariotest
> > +    def test_ifname(self) -> None:
> > +        ifs = tunbridge.ip.ifs(self.guest)
> > +        exeter.assert_eq(set(ifs), {'lo', self.ifname})
> 
> ...why does a "Scenario" have a .ifname?

Yeah, the readability of the Scenario mechanism was something I was
particularly concerned about.  I think the concept is valuable, but
I'm very open to different ways of naming or organising it, if we can
up with something better.

A "Scenario" (specifically a subclass of exeter.Scenario) is a group
of tests with a common set of parameters.  In this case
UnconfiguredScenario is a bunch of tests about the behaviour of pasta
without --config-net.  Each of those tests has access to the host and
guest sites, the expected interface name, address and gateway in the
guest - that is, the contents of an UncofiguredScenario instance.
That instance describes a real (simulated) environment in which we can
run those tests.

You use this by supplying a function which sets things up, then yields
an UnconfiguredScenario instance describing what it set up.  exeter
will run all of the UnconfiguredScenario tests on the environment the
setup function created, each one as a separate test case.

Usually, there are multiple ways to set up a suitable enviroment:
running pasta with an existing guest ns vs. pasta creating the ns is a
simple example.  You can create different setup functions for each of
those, and re-use all the tests in the Scenario against each of those
setups.

> > +
> > +    @tunbridge.ndp.NdpScenario.subscenario
> > +    def test_ndp(self) -> tunbridge.ndp.NdpScenario:
> > +        tunbridge.ip.ifup(self.guest, self.ifname)
> 
> This raises the question of how much of tunbridge one needs to know to
> be able to write a basic test. Why is ifup() in 'ip'? I thought it
> would be more of a "link" thing.

Finding misleading names is a big reason for seeking early feedback.
There's kind of a reason for ifup to be in ip: it optionally takes IP
addresses to configure on the interface.  But... there's no inherent
reason it couldn't take other sorts of network address too, so I'll
look into moving that into a "link" module or something like it.

> I admit I haven't had time to browse tunbridge recently, I'm just
> looking at this series right now.

That's fine.  At some point it would be good to have you look at
tunbridge too, but reading this series _without_ reading tunbridge is
a very useful perspective at this stage.

> 
> > +        return tunbridge.ndp.NdpScenario(client=self.guest,
> > +                                         ifname=self.ifname,
> > +                                         network=self.addr6.network,
> > +                                         gateway=self.gw6)
> 
> This makes sense to me.

Ok, good.  The Scenario stuff might not be as impenetrable as I
feared.

> > +
> > +
> > +@UnconfiguredScenario.test
> > +@contextlib.contextmanager
> > +def simh_pasta_setup() -> Iterator[UnconfiguredScenario]:
> > +    with (tunbridge.sample.simple_host('host') as simh,
> > +          tunbridge.sample.isolated('guest', simh.site) as guest):
> > +        assert simh.ip6 is not None
> > +        assert simh.gw6_ll is not None
> > +        with tasst.pasta.pasta(simh.site, guest):
> > +            yield UnconfiguredScenario(host=simh.site,
> > +                                       guest=guest,
> > +                                       ifname=simh.ifname,
> > +                                       addr6=simh.ip6,
> > +                                       gw6=simh.gw6_ll)
> 
> ...and this too.
> 
> But there's one thing I'm missing: if it's a network simulator, why do
> you need to call a simple_host() method to *describe* the fact that you
> have a host / site? That looks rather unexpected.
> 
> I mean, I would have expected a syntax, in pseudocode, expressing:
> 
> 1. x := node (properties such as a list of interfaces a, b, c)
> 
> 2. pasta implements/connects a
> 
> ...I think this is mostly embedded in the sample.simple_host() thing,
> but I'm not sure how. Maybe it will become clearer once I actually look
> into tunbridge, though.

Right.  "simple_host" isn't just an arbitrary node, but a (small)
predefined network topology: a node configured with a single default
gateway (also simulated, albeit minimally) - that is, the "classic"
pasta host.  The idea is that the tunbridge.sample module will have a
bunch of such example networks - so far there's:
 - isolated() (node with loopback only)
 - back_to_back() (two nodes connected by a veth)
 - simple_host()

Suggestions for better names welcome, as always.

> Of course, I'm trying to push away my bias coming from the fact I was,
> several years ago, for kselftests, aiming at something like this
> instead:
> 
> 	A veth B
> 	x=$(addr A veth)
> 	B ping -c1 $x
> 	A $x vxlan B $(addr B veth)
> 	...
> 
> (where 'veth', 'vxlan' were both reserved keywords). Maybe once
> non-trivial links are implemented in tunbridge it will all become more
> obvious.

I think tunbridge is not dissimilar to this, though with functions
rather than reserved words.  It's a bit hidden here, because we're
using these pre-built chunks - I expect that would be the case for
your system as well, once you get to complex enough setups that you
want to re-use non-trivial pieces.

For example the guts of back_to_back() is:

    with isolated(f'{name}0', sb) as s0, \
         isolated(f'{name}1', sb) as s1:
        if0, if1 = f'veth{name}0', f'veth{name}1'
        with veth.veth(s0, if0, s1, if1):
	    ...

There's more, but that's mostly about IP allocation (it optionally
does that).

> > +
> > +
> > +if __name__ == '__main__':
> > +    exeter.main()
> > diff --git a/test/run b/test/run
> > index 3872a56e..4f09d767 100755
> > --- a/test/run
> > +++ b/test/run
> > @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ KERNEL=${KERNEL:-"/boot/vmlinuz-$(uname -r)"}
> >  
> >  COMMIT="$(git log --oneline --no-decorate -1)"
> >  
> > -# Let exeter tests written in Python find their modules
> > +# Let exeter tests written in Python find their modules and binaries to run
> >  export PYTHONPATH=${BASEPATH}/exeter/py3:${BASEPATH}/tunbridge:${BASEPATH}
> > +export PASTA=${PASTA:-${BASEPATH}/../pasta}
> > +
> >  
> >  . lib/util
> >  . lib/context
> > @@ -75,8 +77,8 @@ run() {
> >  	exeter build/build.py
> >  	exeter build/static_checkers.sh
> >  
> > +	exeter pasta/ndp.py
> >  	setup pasta
> > -	test pasta/ndp
> >  	test pasta/dhcp
> >  	test pasta/tcp
> >  	test pasta/udp
> > diff --git a/test/tasst/__init__.py b/test/tasst/__init__.py
> > index fd4fe9a8..f5386b3a 100644
> > --- a/test/tasst/__init__.py
> > +++ b/test/tasst/__init__.py
> > @@ -8,3 +8,7 @@
> >  #
> >  # Copyright Red Hat
> >  # Author: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > +
> > +from . import pasta
> > +
> > +__all__ = ['pasta']
> > diff --git a/test/tasst/pasta.py b/test/tasst/pasta.py
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..91f59036
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/tasst/pasta.py
> > @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> > +#! /usr/bin/env python3
> > +#
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +#
> > +# TASST - Test A Simple Socket Transport
> > +#
> > +# test/tasst/pasta.py - Helpers for seeting up pasta instances
> > +#
> > +# Copyright Red Hat
> > +# Author: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > +
> > +import contextlib
> > +import os
> > +from typing import Iterator
> > +
> > +import tunbridge
> > +
> > +
> > +@contextlib.contextmanager
> > +def pasta(host: tunbridge.Site, guest: tunbridge.Site, *opts: str) \
> > +        -> Iterator[tunbridge.site.SiteProcess]:
> > +    if tunbridge.unshare.parent(guest) is not host:
> > +        raise ValueError("pasta guest must be a namespace under host site")
> > +
> > +    # This implies guest is a namespace site
> > +    assert isinstance(guest, tunbridge.unshare.NsenterSite)
> > +
> > +    exe = os.environ['PASTA']
> > +
> > +    with host.tempdir() as piddir:
> > +        pidfile = os.path.join(piddir, 'pasta.pid')
> > +        cmd = [exe, '-f', '-P', pidfile] + list(opts) + [f'{guest.pid}']
> > +        with host.bg(*cmd, stop=True) as pasta:
> > +            # Wait for the PID file to be written
> > +            pidstr = None
> > +            while not pidstr:
> > +                pidstr = host.readfile(pidfile, check=False)
> > +            pid = int(pidstr)
> > +            print(f'pasta started, host: {host}, guest: {guest}, pid: {pid}')
> > +            yield pasta
> 
> ...perhaps we could also print version and path.

Path I can easily add.  Version would require an extra invocation of
pasta, which I don't really want to do.

> This part also looks
> quite readable and intuitive to me without having looked into tunbridge
> recently.

Ok, that's promising.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-08  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-02  7:57 [PATCH 0/3] RFC: Preview of tunbridge based tests David Gibson
2025-10-02  7:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] test: Prepare for " David Gibson
2025-10-07 20:00   ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-08  1:27     ` David Gibson
2025-10-02  7:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] test: Add some missing quoting in exeter runner David Gibson
2025-10-02  7:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] test: Re-implement pasta NDP tests using tunbridge & exeter David Gibson
2025-10-07 20:01   ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-08  2:32     ` David Gibson [this message]
2025-10-02  7:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] RFC: Preview of tunbridge based tests David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOXNOyWfgkH3sY03@zatzit \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).