On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 11:31:28PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Thu,  9 Oct 2025 15:04:05 +0200
> Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
[snip]
> > +		union {
> > +			uint32_t flow;
> > +			flow_sidx_t flowside;
> > +			union tcp_listen_epoll_ref tcp_listen;
> > +			union udp_listen_epoll_ref udp;
> > +			uint32_t data;
> > +			int nsdir_fd;
> > +			int queue;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +	uint64_t u64;
> > +};
> > +static_assert(sizeof(union epoll_ref) <= sizeof(union epoll_data),
> > +	      "epoll_ref must have same size as epoll_data");
> 
> Either the comment is misleading, or it should be sizeof(...) != ...

I believe <= is correct, but the comment is misleading.  What we care
about here is that our custom structure/union fits in space available
in the epoll_event structure.  In practice it will have equal size,
but <= is what we care about.

> The rest of the patch looks good to me, I didn't finish reviewing the
> series though.
> 
> -- 
> Stefano
> 

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson