From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] udp: Unify some more inbound/outbound parts of udp_sock_init()
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:08:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPggaWLmx_smLHcC@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021235107.105dd98c@elisabeth>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6634 bytes --]
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:51:07PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 11:34:46 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > udp_sock_init() takes an 'ns' parameter determining if it creates a socket
> > in the guest namespace or host namespace. Alter it to take a pif
> > parameter instead, like tcp_sock_init(), and use that change to slightly
> > reduce code duplication between the HOST and SPLICE cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> > conf.c | 2 +-
> > udp.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> > udp.h | 5 +++--
> > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/conf.c b/conf.c
> > index 26f1bcc0..08cb50aa 100644
> > --- a/conf.c
> > +++ b/conf.c
> > @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static void conf_ports_range_except(const struct ctx *c, char optname,
> > if (optname == 't')
> > ret = tcp_sock_init(c, PIF_HOST, addr, ifname, i);
> > else if (optname == 'u')
> > - ret = udp_sock_init(c, 0, addr, ifname, i);
> > + ret = udp_sock_init(c, PIF_HOST, addr, ifname, i);
> > else
> > /* No way to check in advance for -T and -U */
> > ret = 0;
> > diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
> > index 86585b7e..49dd0144 100644
> > --- a/udp.c
> > +++ b/udp.c
> > @@ -1093,64 +1093,63 @@ int udp_tap_handler(const struct ctx *c, uint8_t pif,
> > /**
> > * udp_sock_init() - Initialise listening sockets for a given port
> > * @c: Execution context
> > - * @ns: In pasta mode, if set, bind with loopback address in namespace
> > + * @pif: Interface to open the socket for (PIF_HOST or PIF_SPLICE)
> > * @addr: Pointer to address for binding, NULL if not configured
> > * @ifname: Name of interface to bind to, NULL if not configured
> > * @port: Port, host order
> > *
> > * Return: 0 on (partial) success, negative error code on (complete) failure
> > */
> > -int udp_sock_init(const struct ctx *c, int ns, const union inany_addr *addr,
> > - const char *ifname, in_port_t port)
> > +int udp_sock_init(const struct ctx *c, uint8_t pif,
> > + const union inany_addr *addr, const char *ifname,
> > + in_port_t port)
> > {
> > + int (*socks)[NUM_PORTS] = pif == PIF_HOST ?
> > + udp_splice_init : udp_splice_ns;
>
> Same as on v1: I'd rather avoid cramping ternary operators like this.
Good idea, done.
> > union udp_listen_epoll_ref uref = {
> > - .pif = ns ? PIF_SPLICE : PIF_HOST,
> > + .pif = pif,
> > .port = port,
> > };
> > int r4 = FD_REF_MAX + 1, r6 = FD_REF_MAX + 1;
> >
> > ASSERT(!c->no_udp);
> >
> > - if (!addr && c->ifi4 && c->ifi6 && !ns) {
> > + if (!addr && c->ifi4 && c->ifi6 && (pif == PIF_HOST)) {
>
> I think it's more readable without the extra parentheses around the
> comparison, because when I see those I automatically think of an
> assignment we want to use in a conditional clause, but that's just a
> comparison.
Done. Thomas Huth finally convinced me not to put precautionary
parens on anything next to && and ||, but I forgot this time :).
>
> > int s;
> >
> > /* Attempt to get a dual stack socket */
> > s = pif_sock_l4(c, EPOLL_TYPE_UDP_LISTEN, PIF_HOST,
> > NULL, ifname, port, uref.u32);
> > - udp_splice_init[V4][port] = s < 0 ? -1 : s;
> > - udp_splice_init[V6][port] = s < 0 ? -1 : s;
> > + socks[V4][port] = s < 0 ? -1 : s;
> > + socks[V6][port] = s < 0 ? -1 : s;
> > if (IN_INTERVAL(0, FD_REF_MAX, s))
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > if ((!addr || inany_v4(addr)) && c->ifi4) {
> > - if (!ns) {
> > - r4 = pif_sock_l4(c, EPOLL_TYPE_UDP_LISTEN, PIF_HOST,
> > - addr ? addr : &inany_any4, ifname,
> > - port, uref.u32);
> > + const union inany_addr *a = addr ?
> > + addr : &inany_any4;
> >
> > - udp_splice_init[V4][port] = r4 < 0 ? -1 : r4;
> > - } else {
> > - r4 = pif_sock_l4(c, EPOLL_TYPE_UDP_LISTEN, PIF_SPLICE,
> > - &inany_loopback4, ifname,
> > - port, uref.u32);
> > - udp_splice_ns[V4][port] = r4 < 0 ? -1 : r4;
> > - }
> > + if (pif == PIF_SPLICE)
> > + a = &inany_loopback4;
> > +
> > + r4 = pif_sock_l4(c, EPOLL_TYPE_UDP_LISTEN, pif, a, ifname,
> > + port, uref.u32);
> > +
> > + socks[V4][port] = r4 < 0 ? -1 : r4;
> > }
> >
> > if ((!addr || !inany_v4(addr)) && c->ifi6) {
> > - if (!ns) {
> > - r6 = pif_sock_l4(c, EPOLL_TYPE_UDP_LISTEN, PIF_HOST,
> > - addr ? addr : &inany_any6, ifname,
> > - port, uref.u32);
> > + const union inany_addr *a = addr ?
> > + addr : &inany_any6;
> >
> > - udp_splice_init[V6][port] = r6 < 0 ? -1 : r6;
> > - } else {
> > - r6 = pif_sock_l4(c, EPOLL_TYPE_UDP_LISTEN, PIF_SPLICE,
> > - &inany_loopback6, ifname,
> > - port, uref.u32);
> > - udp_splice_ns[V6][port] = r6 < 0 ? -1 : r6;
> > - }
> > + if (pif == PIF_SPLICE)
> > + a = &inany_loopback6;
> > +
> > + r6 = pif_sock_l4(c, EPOLL_TYPE_UDP_LISTEN, pif, a, ifname,
> > + port, uref.u32);
> > +
> > + socks[V6][port] = r6 < 0 ? -1 : r6;
> > }
> >
> > if (IN_INTERVAL(0, FD_REF_MAX, r4) || IN_INTERVAL(0, FD_REF_MAX, r6))
> > @@ -1216,7 +1215,8 @@ static void udp_port_rebind(struct ctx *c, bool outbound)
> >
> > if ((c->ifi4 && socks[V4][port] == -1) ||
> > (c->ifi6 && socks[V6][port] == -1))
> > - udp_sock_init(c, outbound, NULL, NULL, port);
> > + udp_sock_init(c, outbound ? PIF_SPLICE : PIF_HOST,
> > + NULL, NULL, port);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/udp.h b/udp.h
> > index 8f8531ad..f78dc528 100644
> > --- a/udp.h
> > +++ b/udp.h
> > @@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ int udp_tap_handler(const struct ctx *c, uint8_t pif,
> > sa_family_t af, const void *saddr, const void *daddr,
> > uint8_t ttl, const struct pool *p, int idx,
> > const struct timespec *now);
> > -int udp_sock_init(const struct ctx *c, int ns, const union inany_addr *addr,
> > - const char *ifname, in_port_t port);
> > +int udp_sock_init(const struct ctx *c, uint8_t pif,
> > + const union inany_addr *addr, const char *ifname,
> > + in_port_t port);
> > int udp_init(struct ctx *c);
> > void udp_timer(struct ctx *c, const struct timespec *now);
> > void udp_update_l2_buf(const unsigned char *eth_d, const unsigned char *eth_s);
>
> --
> Stefano
>
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-17 0:34 [PATCH 0/3] RFC: Reduce differences between inbound and outbound socket binding David Gibson
2025-10-17 0:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] tcp: Merge tcp_ns_sock_init[46]() into tcp_sock_init_one() David Gibson
2025-10-20 6:08 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-20 9:24 ` David Gibson
2025-10-20 6:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-20 9:25 ` David Gibson
2025-10-17 0:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] udp: Unify some more inbound/outbound parts of udp_sock_init() David Gibson
2025-10-21 21:51 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-22 0:08 ` David Gibson [this message]
2025-10-17 0:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] tcp, udp: Bind outbound listening sockets by interface instead of address David Gibson
2025-10-21 21:51 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-22 0:34 ` David Gibson
2025-10-22 8:59 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-23 1:18 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPggaWLmx_smLHcC@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).