On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 05:16:08PM -0500, Jon Maloy wrote:
> As a preparation for handling multiple addresses, we update ignore_arp()
> to check against all addresses in the addrs[] array.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>

LGTM, except insofar as I'm still not convinced the v4 only array of
inany_addrs makes sense.

> ---
>  arp.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arp.c b/arp.c
> index bc77a9f..d8063e2 100644
> --- a/arp.c
> +++ b/arp.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
>  static bool ignore_arp(const struct ctx *c,
>  		       const struct arphdr *ah, const struct arpmsg *am)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +
>  	if (ah->ar_hrd != htons(ARPHRD_ETHER)	||
>  	    ah->ar_pro != htons(ETH_P_IP)	||
>  	    ah->ar_hln != ETH_ALEN		||
> @@ -53,9 +55,11 @@ static bool ignore_arp(const struct ctx *c,
>  	    !memcmp(am->sip, am->tip, sizeof(am->sip)))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	/* Don't resolve the guest's assigned address, either. */
> -	if (!memcmp(am->tip, inany_v4(&c->ip4.addrs[0].addr), sizeof(am->tip)))
> -		return true;
> +	/* Don't resolve any of the guest's addresses */
> +	for (i = 0; i < c->ip4.addr_count; i++)
> +		if (!memcmp(am->tip, inany_v4(&c->ip4.addrs[i].addr),
> +			    sizeof(am->tip)))
> +			return true;
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.52.0
> 

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson