From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] udp_vu: Use iov_tail in udp_vu_prepare()
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 11:24:15 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaTYrzAwqcvAw7pu@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260227140330.2216753-8-lvivier@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6034 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 03:03:25PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Rework udp_vu_prepare() to use IOV_REMOVE_HEADER() and IOV_PUT_HEADER()
> to walk through Ethernet, IP and UDP headers instead of the layout-specific
> helpers (vu_eth(), vu_ip(), vu_payloadv4(), vu_payloadv6()) that assume a
> contiguous buffer. The payload length is now implicit in the iov_tail, so
> drop the dlen parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
LGTM, a few nits below.
> ---
> iov.c | 1 -
> udp_vu.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/iov.c b/iov.c
> index 2cf23d284e4a..7c9641968271 100644
> --- a/iov.c
> +++ b/iov.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,6 @@ void *iov_peek_header_(struct iov_tail *tail, void *v, size_t len, size_t align)
> *
> * Return: number of bytes written
> */
> -/* cppcheck-suppress unusedFunction */
> size_t iov_put_header_(struct iov_tail *tail, const void *v, size_t len)
> {
> size_t l = len;
> diff --git a/udp_vu.c b/udp_vu.c
> index dd8904d65a38..6d87f4872268 100644
> --- a/udp_vu.c
> +++ b/udp_vu.c
> @@ -101,52 +101,54 @@ static ssize_t udp_vu_sock_recv(struct iov_tail *data, int s, bool v6)
> * @c: Execution context
> * @data: IO vector tail for the frame
> * @toside: Address information for one side of the flow
> - * @dlen: Packet data length
> *
> * Return: Layer-4 length
> */
> static size_t udp_vu_prepare(const struct ctx *c, const struct iov_tail *data,
> - const struct flowside *toside, ssize_t dlen)
> + const struct flowside *toside)
> {
> - const struct iovec *iov = data->iov;
> - struct ethhdr *eh;
> + struct iov_tail current = *data;
> + struct ethhdr *eh, eh_storage;
> + struct udphdr *uh, uh_storage;
> size_t l4len;
>
> /* ethernet header */
> - eh = vu_eth(iov[0].iov_base);
> + eh = IOV_REMOVE_HEADER(¤t, eh_storage);
>
> memcpy(eh->h_dest, c->guest_mac, sizeof(eh->h_dest));
> memcpy(eh->h_source, c->our_tap_mac, sizeof(eh->h_source));
>
> /* initialize header */
> if (inany_v4(&toside->eaddr) && inany_v4(&toside->oaddr)) {
> - struct iphdr *iph = vu_ip(iov[0].iov_base);
> - struct udp_payload_t *bp = vu_payloadv4(iov[0].iov_base);
> - const struct iovec payload_iov = {
> - .iov_base = bp->data,
> - .iov_len = dlen,
> - };
> - struct iov_tail payload = IOV_TAIL(&payload_iov, 1, 0);
> + struct iphdr *iph, iph_storage;
>
> eh->h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
>
> + iph = IOV_REMOVE_HEADER(¤t, iph_storage);
> *iph = (struct iphdr)L2_BUF_IP4_INIT(IPPROTO_UDP);
>
> - l4len = udp_update_hdr4(iph, &bp->uh, &payload, toside, true);
> + uh = IOV_REMOVE_HEADER(¤t, uh_storage);
> + l4len = udp_update_hdr4(iph, uh, ¤t, toside, true);
> +
> + current = *data;
> + IOV_PUT_HEADER(¤t, eh);
> + IOV_PUT_HEADER(¤t, iph);
> + IOV_PUT_HEADER(¤t, uh);
The puts for eh and uh can be factored out of the if/else.
> } else {
> - struct ipv6hdr *ip6h = vu_ip(iov[0].iov_base);
> - struct udp_payload_t *bp = vu_payloadv6(iov[0].iov_base);
> - const struct iovec payload_iov = {
> - .iov_base = bp->data,
> - .iov_len = dlen,
> - };
> - struct iov_tail payload = IOV_TAIL(&payload_iov, 1, 0);
> + struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, ip6h_storage;
>
> eh->h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>
> + ip6h = IOV_REMOVE_HEADER(¤t, ip6h_storage);
> *ip6h = (struct ipv6hdr)L2_BUF_IP6_INIT(IPPROTO_UDP);
>
> - l4len = udp_update_hdr6(ip6h, &bp->uh, &payload, toside, true);
> + uh = IOV_REMOVE_HEADER(¤t, uh_storage);
> + l4len = udp_update_hdr6(ip6h, uh, ¤t, toside, true);
> +
> + current = *data;
> + IOV_PUT_HEADER(¤t, eh);
> + IOV_PUT_HEADER(¤t, ip6h);
> + IOV_PUT_HEADER(¤t, uh);
> }
>
> return l4len;
> @@ -165,9 +167,10 @@ static void udp_vu_csum(const struct flowside *toside,
> struct iov_tail payload = *data;
> struct udphdr *uh, uh_storage;
> bool ipv4 = src4 && dst4;
> + int hdrlen = sizeof(struct ethhdr) +
> + (ipv4 ? sizeof(struct iphdr) : sizeof(struct ipv6hdr));
>
> - iov_drop_header(&payload,
> - udp_vu_hdrlen(!ipv4) - sizeof(struct udphdr));
> + iov_drop_header(&payload, hdrlen);
udp_vu_prepare() and udp_vu_csum() independently locate the UDP
header, but they're called in fairly close proximity. Would it make
more sense to pass the UDP header and payload tail separately to each
of them?
> uh = IOV_REMOVE_HEADER(&payload, uh_storage);
>
> if (ipv4)
> @@ -208,8 +211,8 @@ void udp_vu_sock_to_tap(const struct ctx *c, int s, int n, flow_sidx_t tosidx)
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> + int elem_cnt, elem_used;
> ssize_t dlen;
> - int elem_cnt;
>
> vu_init_elem(elem, iov_vu, ARRAY_SIZE(elem));
>
> @@ -225,18 +228,20 @@ void udp_vu_sock_to_tap(const struct ctx *c, int s, int n, flow_sidx_t tosidx)
> vu_queue_rewind(vq, elem_cnt);
> continue;
> }
> + elem_used = data.cnt;
>
> /* release unused buffers */
> - vu_queue_rewind(vq, elem_cnt - data.cnt);
> + vu_queue_rewind(vq, elem_cnt - elem_used);
>
> if (data.cnt > 0) {
> - vu_set_vnethdr(vdev, data.iov[0].iov_base, data.cnt);
> - udp_vu_prepare(c, &data, toside, dlen);
> + vu_set_vnethdr(vdev, data.iov[0].iov_base, elem_used);
> + iov_drop_header(&data, VNET_HLEN);
> + udp_vu_prepare(c, &data, toside);
> if (*c->pcap) {
> udp_vu_csum(toside, &data);
> - pcap_iov(data.iov, data.cnt, VNET_HLEN);
> + pcap_iov(data.iov, data.cnt, 0);
> }
> - vu_flush(vdev, vq, elem, data.cnt);
> + vu_flush(vdev, vq, elem, elem_used);
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 2.53.0
>
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 14:03 [PATCH 00/12] vhost-user,udp: Handle multiple iovec entries per virtqueue element Laurent Vivier
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 01/12] iov: Add iov_tail_truncate() and iov_tail_zero_end() Laurent Vivier
2026-03-01 23:47 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 02/12] vhost-user: Use ARRAY_SIZE(elem) instead of VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE Laurent Vivier
2026-03-01 23:48 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 03/12] udp_vu: Use iov_tail to manage virtqueue buffers Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:03 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 04/12] udp_vu: Move virtqueue management from udp_vu_sock_recv() to its caller Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:05 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 05/12] iov: Add IOV_PUT_HEADER() to write header data back to iov_tail Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:08 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 06/12] udp: Pass iov_tail to udp_update_hdr4()/udp_update_hdr6() Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:13 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 07/12] udp_vu: Use iov_tail in udp_vu_prepare() Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:24 ` David Gibson [this message]
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 08/12] vu_common: Pass iov_tail to vu_set_vnethdr() Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:51 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 09/12] vu_common: Accept explicit iovec counts in vu_set_element() Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:54 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 10/12] vu_common: Accept explicit iovec count per element in vu_init_elem() Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:55 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 11/12] vu_common: Prepare to use multibuffer with guest RX Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 0:59 ` David Gibson
2026-02-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 12/12] vhost-user,udp: Use 2 iovec entries per element Laurent Vivier
2026-03-02 1:03 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaTYrzAwqcvAw7pu@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).