On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 07:15:45AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Fri,  6 Feb 2026 17:17:35 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > Here's a bunch of patches aimed at fixing bug 179, and reworking the
> > currently broken inactivity timer along the way.
> > 
> > I believe patches 1..2/4 are ready to go - I've tested them, and I'm
> > happy with how they're behaving.  Patches 3..4/4 I think are correct,
> > but I've been getting bogged down in details trying to test them in
> > the specific FIN_WAIT_2 situation that occurs in bug 179.
> 
> I just tested things manually by cycling guest interfaces and checking
> that keepalives come and eventually cause connection resets, as well as
> that the activity timeout (shortened via define) triggers after the
> expected time.

Nice.

> It's not great but I couldn't figure out a way to simulate the issue
> with a single namespace test (without any connecting interface that can
> be brought down), and simulating this with multiple namespaces
> connected via veth looks doable, but not easy to integrate with the
> existing tests.

Right.  I think it can be tested without bouncing interfaces at all -
however it needs quite specific behaviour from both the client and the
server.  I couldn't figure out a way to convince socat to do what I
wanted, so it would probably need custom endpoint programs.

> Meanwhile the reporter of https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=179
> confirms this series solves the issue, and delaying this further
> doesn't sound like a good idea, so I went ahead and finally applied
> this, fixing a trivial conflict with 812cdb802c6e ("tcp: Move tap
> header update out of tcp_fill_headers()") on the way.

Makes sense to me.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson