On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 09:17:48AM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 08:11:50PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2026 12:53:23 +1100 > > David Gibson wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2026 at 12:44:41PM -0500, Jon Maloy wrote: > > > > Some migration address structures and functions have a _v1 suffix. > > > > This is confusing, since they are currently handling version 2 of > > > > the migration protocol. We are now going to introduce a new version > > > > 3 of the protocol, so we choose to give these functions the correct > > > > suffix _v2 instead. This is in correspondence with current reality, > > > > and will help make a clearer distinction between the old and the new > > > > versions of those functions. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy > > > > Reviewed-by: David Gibson > > > > > > Stefano, this is a sensible cleanup independent of the rest of the > > > series. Please apply. > > > > Sure, I will. > > > > What about 5/13, should I apply that independently as well, to start > > cutting down a bit on the series? Jon, thoughts? > > No. Unlike 9/13, 5/13 depends on the earlier patches in the series. Sorry, I mixed up 5/13 with a different one. Yes, going ahead and merging 5/13 also makes sense. -- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson