On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 01:38:59AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Tue,  3 Mar 2026 14:04:46 -0500
> Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Some migration address structures and functions have a _v1 suffix.
> > This is confusing, since they are currently handling version 2 of
> > the migration protocol. We are soon going to introduce a new version
> > 3 of the protocol, so we choose to give these functions the correct
> > suffix _v2 instead. This is in correspondence with current reality,
> > and will help make a clearer distinction between the old and the new
> > versions of those functions.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> 
> Applied.
> 
> By the way, I think that adding david@gibson.dropbear.id.au in To: for
> these patches and series is enough to reach David.

It is, yes.  I prefer to use my upstream address for upstream patches,
so I ignore the copies to the RH email.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson