On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 09:12:35AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:29:22 +1000 > David Gibson wrote: > > > We parse --fd twice: once in isolate_initial() just to avoid clobbering > > the passed in fd. Then we parse it "for real" in conf(), to set c->fd_tap > > and other configuration variables. > > > > Change this, so that we return the value parsed early from > > isolate_initial() and set c->fd_tap from that. This doesn't accomplish > > much immediately, but will make some further cleanups possible. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson > > --- > > conf.c | 2 +- > > isolation.c | 6 +++++- > > isolation.h | 2 +- > > passt.c | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/conf.c b/conf.c > > index 6d83daef..41c9d557 100644 > > --- a/conf.c > > +++ b/conf.c > > @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv) > > c->fd_control_listen = c->fd_control = -1; > > break; > > case 'F': > > - c->fd_tap = conf_tap_fd(optarg); > > + /* --fd was parsed early and c->fd_tap set in main() */ > > c->one_off = true; > > *c->sock_path = 0; > > break; > > diff --git a/isolation.c b/isolation.c > > index 07b281bb..4bb79e34 100644 > > --- a/isolation.c > > +++ b/isolation.c > > @@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ static int move_root(void) > > * - close all open files except for standard streams and the one from --fd > > * Mustn't: > > * - remove filesystem access (we need to access files during setup) > > + * > > + * Return: fd number from --fd, or -1 if not specified > > I think this is a rather weird value to return for a function that's > called isolate_initial(). Agreed, but there are reasons.. > Are patches 1/2 and 2/2 really needed for the > rest of the series? I don't quite see the connection. 1) (minor) The new semantics of conf_tap_fd() introduced in 3/6 work better (IMO) for its use in close_open_files(), but don't work for its reuse during the "main" arg parse. Removing that second parse avoids the problem. 2) (major) 4/6 significantly simplifies the close_range() logic, but it involves *moving* the tap descriptor given with --fd (using dup2(2). That means if we parsed it again, it would now be wrong. I think the weirdness would also be mitigated, if close_open_files() became isolate_fds(), and was called directly from main() rather than via isolate_initial(). > > I'm still reviewing the rest of the series. > > -- > Stefano > -- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson