On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 08:03:26AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2026 01:28:58 +0900
> Hayato Kiwata <dev@haytok.jp> wrote:
> 
> > If fwd_listen_init() fails while switching to new forwarding rules
> > received from pesto, we currently close the old listening sockets,
> > report an error and keep the (partially bound) new rules. That leaves
> > pasta in a state the user didn't ask for.
> > 
> > Make fwd_listen_switch() return the result of fwd_listen_init(), and
> > call it a second time from conf_handler() on failure to switch back
> > to the old rules.
> 
> Ah, right, brilliant!  I didn't realise that it doesn't actually need
> any further change because the other rules are always in
> c->fwd_pending.

Right, I made it that way on purpose to support this kind of revert.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson