From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, passt-dev@passt.top,
sbrivio@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tcp: add SO_PEEK_OFF socket option tor TCPv6
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:25:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9567ddd-cc84-4fbc-bb6d-b719b2cb723c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL+tcoDgq+MmNz6Eo_61eBJ2fduyxL1j+kbo_9AYtB4o3tJO5w@mail.gmail.com>
On 2024-08-23 19:51, Jason Xing wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 5:19 AM <jmaloy@redhat.com> wrote:
>> From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
>>
>> When we added the SO_PEEK_OFF socket option to TCP we forgot
>> to add it even for TCP on IPv6.
> Even though you said "we forgot", I'm not sure if this patch series
> belongs to net-next material...
I agree regarding the fix.
The selftest is new however, and belongs in net-next because of that.
Since I made it one series I decided for net-next, but I leave it to the
discretion of Jakub and the maintainer of the linux-kselftest system to
decide where they go.
///jon
>
>> We do that here.
>>
>> Fixes: 05ea491641d3 ("tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF socket option")
>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
>
> You seem to forget to carry Eric's Reviewed-by tag, please see the link :)
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89iJmdGdAN1OZEfoM2LNVOewkYDuPXObRoNWhGyn93P=8OQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-23 21:19 [PATCH 0/2] Adding SO_PEEK_OFF for TCPv6 jmaloy
2024-08-23 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] tcp: add SO_PEEK_OFF socket option tor TCPv6 jmaloy
2024-08-23 23:51 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-26 22:25 ` Jon Maloy [this message]
2024-08-24 8:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-08-23 21:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests: add selftest for tcp SO_PEEK_OFF support jmaloy
2024-08-23 23:44 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-26 19:58 ` Jon Maloy
2024-09-01 0:32 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9567ddd-cc84-4fbc-bb6d-b719b2cb723c@redhat.com \
--to=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).