From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: passt.top; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lgut.eu Authentication-Results: passt.top; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lgut-eu.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lgut-eu.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=E/9PLjVI; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by passt.top (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885CC5A004C for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:09:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a910860e4dcso126589866b.3 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:09:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lgut-eu.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1727086149; x=1727690949; darn=passt.top; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nknjzEFJDr5nqfPMgJwREy5Cuns3QdwQ+bmCBAOlqXs=; b=E/9PLjVIIO0L7jUpw20pT/IgeH9Y0btvlahpU2QQwwzY+1bzzjvzX+7rxkxqo240ru dP8t4ISr+8WHsmlh9hBzZcdx8JfxuMF/JdTRz70vCbnuyfog48iC8kQykFr0Lqr/28qc SIbdNeeGl09GRpKShpbGuuMTzXP3yfSVXZihaZdTQ0CJZ4fdh083mKQ18ndy3YEDuHva DN8Q9QloyXer26bd7nYMFLk11MbH/qGIbne8FcsBjMHYaDQpakph7O1qeq2U8Mf0975p XfdeS2thWPUwrKI0IvTFhFhozhgTZyrXI+gYIHRtHOWlOGOfJn64ZaMrYCUIoTuRnSs4 NZrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727086149; x=1727690949; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nknjzEFJDr5nqfPMgJwREy5Cuns3QdwQ+bmCBAOlqXs=; b=vtL4kFsKzFAoP5ktsvzNIOJKcC0AkdNZ12Xi8LhNhSsTfNfmHyBKxRhbzUlXGM17ou hgk1z6N2JM10vefZCGk5y12pSNY8dp3rAcj2xX4RKGpF2ATwpwxc50z3ObGfUpe2ZgtK LYykDBzG7xWAcwqVoqkVgU5x8lJgs8pbQrs4T2G8gMMfoRczul9XZWkWr/+bPwG0dnF6 Umstamowvp4EE2/KA97AclcxXlsIXVZ8QGXoWd/NuWC9BPcKv6hPnVQZUaHd5gXFV4X9 NwoAAEGG/2QzxAWdwdBdeY4xzLOvcWotj3vQ2nTVeD7sefWtp2VQwxL3A7L3/y2PTJde 15NA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVmlBrzFdj0xHKbltPv2W7jWsE4+s/L6VpjfB+ohY/sGmG3af5yd3/ynjbkkwyHHEbTiJYOrTFUG3c=@passt.top X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxN7WIPhjVNPJ772W5BfI7OxfkSpFtTiG+NLnVULghXsAnltHSS 8vbNzpNPinPgza0iQTwRjBODrdL+B/82fOnLBM9zm7EwUcTZH942fpa6bQFNxLY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGGMizraVpFXHopXtFOjzlPM/Yn9bgmSjqzZBeX6+MqrzMViJLFC/4U+D9WXdGlokYnDGb5Jw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:f79d:b0:a8a:8d81:97b1 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a90d501abd3mr1108864266b.27.1727086148831; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.135] (ip-046-005-003-117.um12.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [46.5.3.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a90612b33d9sm1182928666b.114.2024.09.23.03.09.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] mbuto: Make it work on Arch Linux From: Lukasz Gut To: David Gibson Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:09:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20240918101532.85299-1-lgut@lgut.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: QUYGL6EOXCYJBTST6V3AOP3R3A2FT3SZ X-Message-ID-Hash: QUYGL6EOXCYJBTST6V3AOP3R3A2FT3SZ X-MailFrom: lgut@lgut.eu X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: sbrivio@redhat.com, sevinj.aghayeva@gmail.com, passt-dev@passt.top X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion and patches for passt Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 2024-09-23 at 13:45 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:12:54PM +0200, Lukasz Gut wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > >=20 > > This set of patches makes mbuto work also on Arch Linux. > > I have changed PATCH 4/4 based on your comments. > >=20 > > Thank you for pointing out the correct recepient list. >=20 > One overall nit in the commit messages, rather than the patches themslves= : >=20 > To me "ld" without clarification means the static linker not the > dynamic linker (that's "ld.so"). But many of your messages are > referring to the dynamic linker as "ld". Thanks David for pointing that out, I will be more specific next time. -- Lukasz