Re: Port Forwarding between host-guest via passt using QEMU-libvirt

Re: Port Forwarding between host-guest via passt using QEMU-libvirt

[David Gibson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1437 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 02:47:19PM -0500, James Sinton wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm having trouble getting host-to-guest port forwarding to work via passt
> for a userspace connection:
> 
> Please see my post on Superuser for more details:
> 
> https://superuser.com/q/1927306/3115375?sem=2

Sorry it's taken me a while to look at this.

It looks like passt is accepting the ssh connection, but unable to
itself connect to the guest.  Unfortunately there aren't really any
clues as to why, so far.

A couple of easy bits of information which might help:
  1. What's the passt version? (`passt --version` on the host)
  2. What's the IP configuration within the Windows guest?
  3. What's the IP configuration on the host? (`ip addr show` and `ip
     route show`)
  4. What's the output from `ssh -v`

That information might supply some clues, but it's pretty likely we'll
need debugging or packet capture output from passt to work this out.
Unfortunately, that's a bit trickier than it should be because libvirt
doesn't (yet) have the ability to pass the necessary options to passt.
Let's start with the information above, then we can work out the steps
to get more detailed debugging information if we need it.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Port Forwarding between host-guest via passt using QEMU-libvirt

[Stefano Brivio]

On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 12:08:07 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> That information might supply some clues, but it's pretty likely we'll
> need debugging or packet capture output from passt to work this out.
> Unfortunately, that's a bit trickier than it should be because libvirt
> doesn't (yet) have the ability to pass the necessary options to passt.

By the way, this feature request for libvirt is currently tracked at
(public RHEL ticket, but applies to libvirt in general):

  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-52281

Meanwhile, one thing you can do is to add a wrapper at
/usr/local/bin/passt (don't forget to chmod 755 it) with these lines:

---
#!/bin/sh

/usr/bin/passt --debug --log-file /tmp/passt.log --pcap /tmp/passt.pcap $@
---

that's the way I currently debug stuff with libvirt, at least.

Note that passt can take guest-side packet captures (you would find it
at /tmp/passt.pcap, which you can open with Wireshark / tshark later),
which is usually convenient for cases like these.

-- 
Stefano

Re: Port Forwarding between host-guest via passt using QEMU-libvirt

[David Gibson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1797 bytes --]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 01:37:36PM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 12:08:07 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > That information might supply some clues, but it's pretty likely we'll
> > need debugging or packet capture output from passt to work this out.
> > Unfortunately, that's a bit trickier than it should be because libvirt
> > doesn't (yet) have the ability to pass the necessary options to passt.
> 
> By the way, this feature request for libvirt is currently tracked at
> (public RHEL ticket, but applies to libvirt in general):
> 
>   https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-52281
> 
> Meanwhile, one thing you can do is to add a wrapper at
> /usr/local/bin/passt (don't forget to chmod 755 it) with these lines:
> 
> ---
> #!/bin/sh
> 
> /usr/bin/passt --debug --log-file /tmp/passt.log --pcap /tmp/passt.pcap $@
> ---
> 
> that's the way I currently debug stuff with libvirt, at least.
> 
> Note that passt can take guest-side packet captures (you would find it
> at /tmp/passt.pcap, which you can open with Wireshark / tshark later),
> which is usually convenient for cases like these.

Right.  I think this is the way forward, awkward though it is.

I was considering an alternative approach: to kill the passt instance
started by libvirt and manually restart it with the options we want.
That requires a pretty recent qemu to reliably reconnect to the new
passt, though, and generally has more places something could go wrong.
The wrapper script is the way to go, thanks for the instructions
Stefano.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Port Forwarding between host-guest via passt using QEMU-libvirt

[David Gibson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7240 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 11:58:52PM -0600, James Sinton wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Thank you for getting back to me. I have been trying to rehash some of the
> Arch documentation (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Libvirt), and I worked
> through parts of this tutorial for WinApps as another resource for
> configuring libvirt to run a Windows guest on a Linux host:
> 
> https://github.com/winapps-org/winapps/blob/main/docs/libvirt.md
> 
> I think I found that the services for the libvirt daemon were not enabled.
> I also double checked that the user on the host has been added to the
> libvirt group.
> 
> One tidbit is that the host is connected to the internet via WiFi (wlp6s0),
> hence, the motivation to use passt in userspace mode.

I'm not really sure why wifi motivates passt particularly, but that's
not really relevant either.

> A couple of easy bits of information which might help:
>   1. What's the passt version? (`passt --version` on the host)
> 
> passt 2025_09_11.6cbcccc

Ta.

>   2. What's the IP configuration within the Windows guest?
> 
> The windows guest:
> 
> Aggregated link speed (Receive/Transmit): 10/10 (Gbps)
> IPv6 address: fdac:14bf:9c6f:942d:d4:e913:5731:9d0a

This address doesn't match the host, which is unexpected.  That
suggests that Windows is using SLAAC prefix discovery, but not using
DHCPv6 to get the correct exact address.  Since your ssh is
specifically using IPv4 addresses, this oddity is unlikely to be
related to the problem.

> Link-local IPv6 address: fe80::5374:1174:7d88:4c94%12
> IPv6 default gateway: fe80::11a9:af53:4e56:ea79%12
> IPv4 address: 10.0.1.205
> IPv4 DNS servers: 10.0.1.1 (Unencrypted)
> 8.8.8.8 (Unencrypted)
> Manufacturer: Red Hat, Inc.
> Description: Red Hat VirtIO Ethernet Adapter
> Driver version: 100.101.104.28500
> Physical address (MAC): 52:54:00:23:01:04
> 
> Notice that it matches wlp6s0 below due to the userspace mode config.

Right, making the guest match the host interface configuration is
passt default behaviour.

>   3. What's the IP configuration on the host? (`ip addr show` and `ip route
> show`)
> 
> FYI, I have some docker containers running on the host as well. virbr0 is
> part of the virsh net. But in userspace mode with port forwarding, I
> shouldn't need an active bridge network for host-guest communication,
> correct?

Correct.

> $ ip addr show
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group
> default qlen 1000
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 2: enp7s0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN
> group default qlen 1000
>     link/ether 24:4b:fe:8e:01:eb brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     altname enx244bfe8e01eb
> 3: wlp6s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state
> UP group default qlen 1000
>     link/ether 8c:c6:81:ce:46:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     altname wlx8cc681ce460e
>     inet 10.0.1.205/24 brd 10.0.1.255 scope global noprefixroute wlp6s0
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fdac:14bf:9c6f:942d:2d42:74ac:5a3:58cd/64 scope global dynamic
> noprefixroute
>        valid_lft 1726sec preferred_lft 1726sec
>     inet6 fe80::11a9:af53:4e56:ea79/64 scope link noprefixroute
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Nothing too odd here that I can spot.

[snip]
> $ ip route show
> default via 10.0.1.1 dev wlp6s0 proto static metric 600
> 10.0.1.0/24 dev wlp6s0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.1.205 metric 600
> 172.16.0.0/16 dev br-00cee4dd5f5b proto kernel scope link src 172.16.0.1
> 172.17.0.0/16 dev docker0 proto kernel scope link src 172.17.0.1 linkdown
> 172.18.0.0/16 dev br-3d69e1e5d7f4 proto kernel scope link src 172.18.0.1
> 172.19.0.0/16 dev br-48249c6f88eb proto kernel scope link src 172.19.0.1
> 192.168.100.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.1
> linkdown

Nor here.

>   4. What's the output from `ssh -v`
> 
> $ ssh -vp 8022 127.0.0.1
> debug1: OpenSSH_10.0p2, OpenSSL 3.5.3 16 Sep 2025
> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
> debug1: Reading configuration data
> /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/20-systemd-ssh-proxy.conf
> debug1: Reading configuration data
> /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/30-libvirt-ssh-proxy.conf
> debug1: Connecting to 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1] port 8022.
> debug1: Connection established.
> debug1: identity file
> . . .
> debug1: identity file
> debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_10.0
> kex_exchange_identification: read: Connection reset by peer
> Connection reset by 127.0.0.1 port 8022

That's consistent with passt accepting the connection, not managing to
contact the guest and so resetting.  That's what I expected, but it's
useful to confirm.

Unfortunately, I have no guesses based on the above information; we're
going to need debug logs and/or packet captures.  More information on
that in reply to Stefano's follow up.

> On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 7:11 PM David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 02:47:19PM -0500, James Sinton wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I'm having trouble getting host-to-guest port forwarding to work via
> > passt
> > > for a userspace connection:
> > >
> > > Please see my post on Superuser for more details:
> > >
> > > https://superuser.com/q/1927306/3115375?sem=2
> >
> > Sorry it's taken me a while to look at this.
> >
> > It looks like passt is accepting the ssh connection, but unable to
> > itself connect to the guest.  Unfortunately there aren't really any
> > clues as to why, so far.
> >
> > A couple of easy bits of information which might help:
> >   1. What's the passt version? (`passt --version` on the host)
> >   2. What's the IP configuration within the Windows guest?
> >   3. What's the IP configuration on the host? (`ip addr show` and `ip
> >      route show`)
> >   4. What's the output from `ssh -v`
> >
> > That information might supply some clues, but it's pretty likely we'll
> > need debugging or packet capture output from passt to work this out.
> > Unfortunately, that's a bit trickier than it should be because libvirt
> > doesn't (yet) have the ability to pass the necessary options to passt.
> > Let's start with the information above, then we can work out the steps
> > to get more detailed debugging information if we need it.
> >
> > --
> > David Gibson (he or they)       | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> > david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
> >                                 | around.
> > http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
> >

> _______________________________________________
> user mailing list -- passt-user@passt.top
> To unsubscribe send an email to passt-user-leave@passt.top


-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]