From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: Rahul <llvm.zentrik@gmail.com>, passt-user@passt.top
Subject: Re: UDP drops when source port is in use in the init namespace
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 19:09:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apfnutmZnc-mY3AF@gractus.seuss> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178828896845.2775.7538203367154726506@maja>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4131 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 08:56:01PM +0200, Stefano Brivio via user wrote:
> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 20:56:01 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> To: Rahul <llvm.zentrik@gmail.com>
> CC: passt-user@passt.top
> Subject: Re: UDP drops when source port is in use in the init namespace
> Organization: Red Hat
> List-Id: "For passt users: support, questions and answers"
> <passt-user.passt.top>
>
> Rahul, thanks for the report and for the investigation. Remarks and
> some answers inline:
>
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 11:12:44 +0100
> Rahul <llvm.zentrik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm seeing DNS requests being dropped when using pasta 20250217. As far as
> > I can tell, UDP
> > flows where the source port chosen in the namespace is already in use in the
> > init namespace get dropped.
> >
> > All three fwd_nat_from_*() preserve the source port for UDP:
> >
> > tgt->oport = 0;
> > if (proto == IPPROTO_UDP)
> > /* But for UDP preserve the source port */
> > tgt->oport = ini->eport;
>
> This is intended, to offer compatibility with applications or protocols
> that might rely on UDP source ports to be preserved, and, in general,
> to be as transparent as possible. But:
>
> > That forces a bind() to it, and udp_flow_sock() treats bind failure as
> > fatal, so
> > the flow is cancelled and the datagram dropped with no error to the sender.
>
> ...this is not, that is, it would definitely be desirable to have a
> fallback for bind() failures.
Probably? The danger with a fallback of this sort is that if you're
using a protocol which cares about the source port it will
work.. until suddenly it doesn't for pretty non-obvious reasons.
Theoretically another option would be to _not_ preserve the source
port by default, but allow forwarding rules to specify source-port
preservation, specifically for cases which do need it. But, that's a
lot more work both to implement and to configure.
> > I don't think I ever hit this with slirp4netns, it looks like libslirp's
> > udp_attach() never
> > binds a port, so the kernel just gives it a random free port.
>
> Right, yes, slirp4netns doesn't attempt to preserve UDP source ports
> outside the namespace. It's a feature we added in pasta.
>
> > I'm not sure whether this is intended, but if it is, is there any way to
> > work
> > around it?
>
> I see two ways of implementing this fallback mechanism, roughly:
>
> 1. pass all the way to _sock_l4() via udp_flow_sock() an additional
> argument to entirely ignore bind() failures (like we do for ICMP
> ping sockets). It might be a rather mechanical change but not my
> preferred approach as we would need an extra argument in a large
> number of functions just for a corner case
>
> 2. I think preferable: detect the failure on bind() here (it should be
> EADDRINUSE, did you check?) and try again from udp_flow_sock() with
> tgt->oport as 0.
>
> Here, "tgt" means the target namespace of the connection, and
> "oport" means "our port", implying the source port (because it's an
> outbound connection from pasta's side).
You'll also need to make sure this takes place _before_ calling
getsockname() to fill in the correct final tgt->oport.
> I think it would be good to try and sketch a solution (maybe starting
> from 1.) to understand what approach would be more elegant and viable.
>
> I don't have much time on my hands right now but I'll definitely
> provide pointers and support if you feel like proposing a patch for
> this.
>
> As a first test / workaround for your usage: did you already check that
> keeping tgt->oport as 0 in the relevant function in fwd.c works?
>
> --
> Stefano
>
> _______________________________________________
> user mailing list -- passt-user@passt.top
> To unsubscribe send an email to passt-user-leave@passt.top
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 10:12 Rahul
2026-09-01 18:56 ` Stefano Brivio
[not found] ` <178828896845.2775.7538203367154726506@maja>
2026-09-02 9:09 ` David Gibson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apfnutmZnc-mY3AF@gractus.seuss \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=llvm.zentrik@gmail.com \
--cc=passt-user@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).