From: Martin Schitter <ms+git@mur.at>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Optimize route dependency solver.
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 14:56:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ce40343-41fa-4195-87da-de425b56f5ea@mur.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917210822.681fa49a@elisabeth>
On 9/17/26 21:08, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>> Never make more resolution attempts than there are still unresolved
>> dependency errors.
>>
>> In the context of my current mesh network with ~700 route entries
>> these changes reduce the required processing time from 5.5s to 15ms.
>
> Ouch. Nice.
After searching for answers, how these ENETUNREACH and EHOSTUNREACH in
the dependency solver routines are actually caused, I finally looked
into the iproute2 code for the save and restore commands:
https://github.com/iproute2/iproute2/blob/e6471d772f3e15a813e6c9a81b4b7adcfad22899/ip/iproute.c#L2314
Now I finally see that this task can be handled without all this stupid
trial-and-error play and doesn't require a limit of route entries if we
just reassemble the routing tables in three successive steps resp. loops:
/* Restore routes in correct order:
* 0. ones for local addresses,
* 1. ones for local networks,
* 2. others (remote networks/hosts).
*/
That's a much nicer and more efficient solution than all our previous
attempts.
So I'll have to rewrite the whole thing again...
It will take a few days.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 18:13 [PATCH v2] Fix for Bug #221 -- Issue concerning bigger routing tables Martin Schitter
2026-09-08 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Fix handling of netlink multipart route dumps Martin Schitter
2026-09-17 19:08 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-09-19 12:56 ` Martin Schitter
2026-09-08 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Timekeeping: Resolving Route Dependencies Martin Schitter
2026-09-17 19:08 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-09-19 12:56 ` Martin Schitter
2026-09-08 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Optimize route dependency solver Martin Schitter
2026-09-17 19:08 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-09-19 12:56 ` Martin Schitter [this message]
2026-09-19 13:07 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ce40343-41fa-4195-87da-de425b56f5ea@mur.at \
--to=ms+git@mur.at \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).