public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Cc: sbrivio@redhat.com, passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] tap: Guard IPv6 tail size subtraction against underflow
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:09:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alRk5FzEBOZm5fOd@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88c01537-385f-40ed-821c-ef02f4c742b8@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2101 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 09:40:03AM -0400, Jon Maloy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2026-07-09 21:36, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 05:56:53PM -0400, Jon Maloy wrote:
> > > In tap6_handler(), iov_tail_size(&data) - sizeof(*ip6h) computes
> > > the expected payload length. IOV_PEEK_HEADER() guarantees at least
> > > sizeof(*ip6h) bytes, but add an explicit check to guard the unsigned
> > > subtraction. A too-small tail would indicate a malformed packet, so
> > > skip it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > v2: Use if-guard instead of assert(), to avoid runtime cost in
> > >      per-packet path and to let the static checker follow the logic.
> 
> I had the idea that the compiler may be smart enough to optimize it out,
> since it is logically redundant, as you note.

I mean, maybe, although I think that's moderately unlikely.  But
assert() is nothing but a macro that says essentially
	if (!condition) abort();
So if the compiler can optimise away the if, it can optimise away the
assert() as well.

> 
> /jon
> 
> > 
> > Why would the if be cheaper than an assert()?  The IOV_PEEK_HEADER()
> > already checks the length, so this check is definitely redundant - it
> > exists only for the benefit of static checkers.
> > 
> > > ---
> > >   tap.c | 5 ++++-
> > >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> > > index 6d93c7ce..6fd5f595 100644
> > > --- a/tap.c
> > > +++ b/tap.c
> > > @@ -986,7 +986,10 @@ resume:
> > >   		if (!ip6h)
> > >   			continue;
> > > -		check = iov_tail_size(&data) - sizeof(*ip6h);
> > > +		check = iov_tail_size(&data);
> > > +		if (check < sizeof(*ip6h))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +		check -= sizeof(*ip6h);
> > >   		saddr = &ip6h->saddr;
> > >   		daddr = &ip6h->daddr;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.52.0
> > > 
> > 
> 

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 21:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix issues and false positives from static analysis Jon Maloy
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] passt: Initialise listening socket fds to -1 Jon Maloy
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] udp_vu: Check iov_tail_clone() return before assigning to msg_iovlen Jon Maloy
2026-07-10  1:32   ` David Gibson
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] tap: Guard IPv6 tail size subtraction against underflow Jon Maloy
2026-07-10  1:36   ` David Gibson
2026-07-10 13:40     ` Jon Maloy
2026-07-13  4:09       ` David Gibson [this message]
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] doc/migration: Use snprintf() for socket path and fix argv access Jon Maloy
2026-07-10  1:37   ` David Gibson
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] doc/migration: Fix buffer type mismatch in recv() call Jon Maloy
2026-07-09 21:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] doc/platform-requirements: Close leaked sockets in test_close_dup() Jon Maloy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alRk5FzEBOZm5fOd@zatzit \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).