[PATCH 5/8] clang-tidy: Suppress sscanf() warning harder

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

We already have a clang-tidy suppression to stop if complaining about our
use of sscanf() in procfs_scan_listen().  However, it now (clang-tidy
22.1.4 or thereabouts) seems there's an additional warning category that
complains about the same thing.  Add that to the suppression.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
 fwd.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fwd.c b/fwd.c
index 0697435d..c0a6adac 100644
--- a/fwd.c
+++ b/fwd.c
@@ -599,7 +599,8 @@ static void procfs_scan_listen(int fd, unsigned int lstate, uint8_t *map)
 	lineread_init(&lr, fd);
 	lineread_get(&lr, &line); /* throw away header */
 	while (lineread_get(&lr, &line) > 0) {
-		/* NOLINTNEXTLINE(cert-err34-c): != 2 if conversion fails */
+		/* != 2 if conversion fails */
+		/* NOLINTNEXTLINE(bugprone-unchecked-string-to-number-conversion,cert-err34-c) */
 		if (sscanf(line, "%*u: %*x:%lx %*x:%*x %x", &port, &state) != 2)
 			continue;
 
-- 
2.54.0