public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] tcp_splice: Remove questionable "optimisation" of pending bytes tracking
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 06:41:43 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604064142.5abdaced@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528050213.679685-8-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On Thu, 28 May 2026 15:02:12 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> We have a special path that avoids updating conn->pending when the amounts
> read and written are equal.  This has a conceptual complexity cost, in
> particular, it means that conn->pending[] is not accurate to its normal
> meaning for a section of the loop body.
> 
> conn->pending[] shares a cacheline with conn->pipe[] and conn->s[], so it's
> almost certainly cache-hot.  It's questionable that avoiding the update
> of pending even outweighs the extra conditional branch, let alone saves
> anything of significance.  Remove it.

I added this when we still had 64-bit counters, that is, two weeks
before commit 37c228ada88b ("tap, tcp, udp, icmp: Cut down on some
oversized buffers"), but now, as you point out, it doesn't make sense anymore.

-- 
Stefano


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-04  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28  5:02 [PATCH 0/8] splice() forwarding cleanups David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] tcp_splice: Remove never-invoked SO_RCVLOWAT logic David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] tcp_splice: Simplify EPOLLRDHUP / eof / FIN handling David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] tcp_splice: Improve EOF exit condition for the loop David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] tcp_splice: Remove goto from forwarding loop David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] tcp_splice: Simplify shutdown(2) handling David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] tcp_splice: Simplify / correct OUT_WAIT flag handling David Gibson
2026-06-04  4:41   ` Stefano Brivio
2026-06-04  5:14     ` David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] tcp_splice: Remove questionable "optimisation" of pending bytes tracking David Gibson
2026-06-04  4:41   ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2026-06-04  5:14     ` David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] tcp_splice: Exit forwarding earlier when stalled read side David Gibson
2026-06-04  4:41   ` Stefano Brivio
2026-06-04  5:26     ` David Gibson
2026-06-04  5:44       ` Stefano Brivio
2026-06-04  7:08         ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260604064142.5abdaced@elisabeth \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).