From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] tcp_splice: Remove questionable "optimisation" of pending bytes tracking
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:14:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aiEJzumTSS4x_nJu@zatzit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604064142.5abdaced@elisabeth>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 04, 2026 at 06:41:43AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2026 15:02:12 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > We have a special path that avoids updating conn->pending when the amounts
> > read and written are equal. This has a conceptual complexity cost, in
> > particular, it means that conn->pending[] is not accurate to its normal
> > meaning for a section of the loop body.
> >
> > conn->pending[] shares a cacheline with conn->pipe[] and conn->s[], so it's
> > almost certainly cache-hot. It's questionable that avoiding the update
> > of pending even outweighs the extra conditional branch, let alone saves
> > anything of significance. Remove it.
>
> I added this when we still had 64-bit counters, that is, two weeks
> before commit 37c228ada88b ("tap, tcp, udp, icmp: Cut down on some
> oversized buffers"), but now, as you point out, it doesn't make sense anymore.
Ah, that makes some sense.
--
David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way
| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 5:02 [PATCH 0/8] splice() forwarding cleanups David Gibson
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] tcp_splice: Remove never-invoked SO_RCVLOWAT logic David Gibson
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] tcp_splice: Simplify EPOLLRDHUP / eof / FIN handling David Gibson
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] tcp_splice: Improve EOF exit condition for the loop David Gibson
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] tcp_splice: Remove goto from forwarding loop David Gibson
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] tcp_splice: Simplify shutdown(2) handling David Gibson
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] tcp_splice: Simplify / correct OUT_WAIT flag handling David Gibson
2026-06-04 4:41 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-06-04 5:14 ` David Gibson
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] tcp_splice: Remove questionable "optimisation" of pending bytes tracking David Gibson
2026-06-04 4:41 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-06-04 5:14 ` David Gibson [this message]
2026-05-28 5:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] tcp_splice: Exit forwarding earlier when stalled read side David Gibson
2026-06-04 4:41 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-06-04 5:26 ` David Gibson
2026-06-04 5:44 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-06-04 7:08 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aiEJzumTSS4x_nJu@zatzit \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).